Candelabrum cells are ubiquitous cerebellar cortex interneurons with specialized circuit properties
To understand how the cerebellar cortex transforms mossy fiber (MF) inputs into Purkinje cell (PC) outputs, it is vital to delineate the elements of this circuit. Candelabrum cells (CCs) are enigmatic interneurons of the cerebellar cortex that have been identified based on their morphology, but thei...
Saved in:
Published in: | Nature neuroscience Vol. 25; no. 6; pp. 702 - 713 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
New York
Nature Publishing Group US
01-06-2022
Nature Publishing Group |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | To understand how the cerebellar cortex transforms mossy fiber (MF) inputs into Purkinje cell (PC) outputs, it is vital to delineate the elements of this circuit. Candelabrum cells (CCs) are enigmatic interneurons of the cerebellar cortex that have been identified based on their morphology, but their electrophysiological properties, synaptic connections and function remain unknown. Here, we clarify these properties using electrophysiology, single-nucleus RNA sequencing, in situ hybridization and serial electron microscopy in mice. We find that CCs are the most abundant PC layer interneuron. They are GABAergic, molecularly distinct and present in all cerebellar lobules. Their high resistance renders CC firing highly sensitive to synaptic inputs. CCs are excited by MFs and granule cells and are strongly inhibited by PCs. CCs in turn primarily inhibit molecular layer interneurons, which leads to PC disinhibition. Thus, inputs, outputs and local signals converge onto CCs to allow them to assume a unique role in controlling cerebellar output.
Candelabrum cells have remained an obscure cerebellar cell type. The authors show that candelabrum cells are the most abundant Purkinje layer interneuron, are molecularly distinct and have a connectivity that allows them to control cerebellar output. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 Equal contribution AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS TO, SR and WGR designed experiments. TO and SR performed electrophysiology experiments. T.N. generated the automated segmentations in the serial EM dataset. N.N. performed smFISH experiments. TO analyzed electrophysiology, smFISH and serial EM data. AN analyzed serial EM data. V.K. and E.M. analyzed snRNAseq data. TO, SR and WGR wrote the paper with input from all authors. |
ISSN: | 1097-6256 1546-1726 1546-1726 |
DOI: | 10.1038/s41593-022-01057-x |