Emergency pediatric radiology imaging trends for non-COVID-19-related illnesses through different stages of the pandemic

• Published in: Emergency radiology Vol. 29; no. 1; pp. 1 - 8
• Main Authors: Kim, Wendy G., Brown, Stephen D., Johnston, Patrick R., Nagler, Joshua, Jarrett, Delma Y.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Cham Springer International Publishing 01-02-2022; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Child; Coronaviruses; COVID-19; Diagnosis; Emergency medical services; Emergency Medicine; Emergency Service, Hospital; Fluoroscopy; Humans; Illnesses; Imaging; Medical imaging; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Original; Original Article; Pandemics; Pediatrics; Radiology; Retrospective Studies; SARS-CoV-2; COVID-19; Emergency Department, Utilization; Pediatric
• ISSN: 1070-3004; 1438-1435; 1438-1435
• DOI: 10.1007/s10140-021-01994-3

Purpose
To evaluate how the COVID-19 pandemic affected the imaging utilization patterns for non-COVID-19-related illness in a pediatric emergency department (ED).
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed radiology reports for ultrasound, CT, MRI, and fluoroscopy studies performed at a pediatric ED in April from 2017 to 2021, excluding studies for respiratory symptoms and trauma. Radiology reports and medical records were reviewed to determine if patients had a positive radiology diagnosis, the type of diagnosis, and whether it required hospital admission. Results from during the pandemic were compared to predicted rates based on pre-pandemic years.
Results
A total of 2198 imaging studies were included. During the COVID-19 pandemic, fewer ED imaging studies were performed compared to predicted. The decrease was greater in April 2020 (RR = 0.56,
p
 < 0.001) than in April 2021 (RR = 0.80,
p
 = 0.038). The odds of positive diagnosis was higher during the pandemic than before, and higher in 2020 (OR 2.53,
p
 < 0.001) than in 2021 (OR 1.38,
p
 = 0.008). The expected numbers of positive diagnoses and hospital admittances remained within the predicted range during the pandemic (
p
 = 0.505–0.873).
Conclusions
Although imaging volumes decreased during the studied months of the pandemic, the number of positive findings was unchanged compared to prior years. No differences were demonstrated in the percentage of patients admitted to the hospital with positive imaging findings. This suggests that, at our institution, the pandemic did not lead to a substantial number of missed diagnoses or severely delay the diagnosis of non-COVID-related conditions. While still lower than expected, imaging volumes increased in April 2021 suggesting a return towards baseline patient behavior as the pandemic conditions improved.