The impact of RHDV-K5 on rabbit populations in Australia: an evaluation of citizen science surveys to monitor rabbit abundance

• Published in: Scientific reports Vol. 9; no. 1; pp. 15229 - 11
• Main Authors: Cox, Tarnya E., Ramsey, David S. L., Sawyers, Emma, Campbell, Susan, Matthews, John, Elsworth, Peter
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London Nature Publishing Group UK 23-10-2019; Nature Publishing Group
• Subjects: 704/172; 704/844; Abundance; Animals; Australia - epidemiology; Biological control; Biological Control Agents - therapeutic use; Caliciviridae Infections - epidemiology; Caliciviridae Infections - prevention & control; Caliciviridae Infections - veterinary; Citizen Science; Data collection; Ecological research; Growth rate; Hemorrhagic Disease Virus, Rabbit - isolation & purification; Humanities and Social Sciences; Humans; multidisciplinary; Rabbit hemorrhagic disease; Rabbits - growth & development; Rabbits - virology; Science; Science (multidisciplinary); Australia
• ISSN: 2045-2322; 2045-2322
• DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-51847-w

The increasing popularity of citizen science in ecological research has created opportunities for data collection from large teams of observers that are widely dispersed. We established a citizen science program to complement the release of a new variant of the rabbit biological control agent, rabbit haemorrhagic disease virus (RHDV), known colloquially as K5, across Australia. We evaluated the impact of K5 on the national rabbit population and compared citizen science and professionally-collected spotlight count data. Of the citizen science sites (n = 219), 93% indicated a decrease in rabbit abundance following the release of K5. The overall finite monthly growth rate in rabbit abundance was estimated as 0.66 (95%CI, 0.26, 1.03), averaging a monthly reduction of 34% at the citizen science sites one month after the release. No such declines were observed at the professionally monitored sites (n = 22). The citizen science data submissions may have been unconsciously biased or the number of professional sites may have been insufficient to detect a change. Citizen science participation also declined by 56% over the post-release period. Future programs should ensure the use of blinded trials to check for unconscious bias and consider how incentives and/or the good will of the participants can be maintained throughout the program.