How should we report the foveal status in eyes with “macula-off” retinal detachment?

• Published in: Eye (London) Vol. 37; no. 2; pp. 228 - 234
• Main Authors: Klaas, Julian E., Siedlecki, Jakob, Steel, David H., Laidlaw, D. Alistair H., Priglinger, Siegfried
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London Nature Publishing Group UK 01-02-2023; Nature Publishing Group
• Subjects: 692/308/53/2423; 692/699/3161/3175; Case reports; Eye; Fovea Centralis; Humans; Laboratory Medicine; Literature reviews; Macula Lutea; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Morphology; Nomenclature; Ophthalmology; Pharmaceutical Sciences/Technology; Retina; Retinal detachment; Retinal Detachment - diagnosis; Retinal Detachment - surgery; Retrospective Studies; Review; Review Article; Surgery; Surgical Oncology; Tomography, Optical Coherence - methods; Visual Acuity; Vitrectomy - methods
• ISSN: 0950-222X; 1476-5454
• DOI: 10.1038/s41433-022-02074-7

Whilst pre- and postoperative multimodal imaging technologies including optical coherence tomography (OCT) have investigated the morphological correlates of worsened visual outcomes in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) with foveal involvement, the nomenclature has adhered to the traditional ophthalmoscopy-based and rather vague term “macula-off”. This article appraises the current literature with regard to the preoperative assessment and nomenclature of the foveal status in macula involving retinal detachment (MIRD). A literature review of recent publications assessing functional or morphological outcomes in MIRD was conducted, using the search terms “fovea-off” or “macula-off”. The search date was April 28
th
, 2021. Original studies in English language were included. Case reports, review articles or letters were excluded. Forty relevant articles (range of publication dates: July 29
th
, 2020 - April 18
th
, 2021) were reviewed to assess the diagnostic modalities used, morphological parameters assessed, and any specific nomenclature introduced to specify the extent of macular detachment. The results suggest widespread variability and inconsistencies with regard to the preoperative assessment, diagnostic modalities and nomenclature used to describe the foveal status in eyes with RRD termed “macula-off”. The extent of macular detachment may be classified by a wide range of morphological parameters, including the height of foveal detachment and the ETDRS grid as overlay tool in OCT devices. There is a scientific and clinical need for an updated nomenclature for eyes with “macula-off” RRD. Preoperative OCT findings should be reported on a regular and standardized basis in order to establish a consensus how to report the foveal status in eyes with MIRD.