"People are now working together for a common good": The effect on social capital of participatory design for community-level sanitation infrastructure in urban informal settlements

• Published in: World development Vol. 174; p. 106449
• Main Authors: Salinger, Allison P, Charles, Isabel, Francis, Naomi, Batagol, Becky, Meo-Sewabu, Litea, Nasir, Sudirman, Bass, Audra, Habsji, Hamdan, Malumu, Losalini, Marzaman, Liza, Prescott, Michaela F, Jane Sawailau, Mere, Syamsu, Syaidah, Taruc, Ruzka R, Tela, Autiko, Vakarewa, Isoa, Wilson, Alexander, Sinharoy, Sheela S
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Pergamon Press 01-02-2024
• Subjects: Regular; Community engagement; Gender; Participatory design; Sanitation; Social capital; Urban informal settlements
• ISSN: 0305-750X; 0305-750X
• DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2023.106449

Communities with higher levels of social capital perform better than communities with lower social capital in community-level water and sanitation interventions and have better health outcomes. Although research recommends bolstering social capital to improve intervention outcomes, few studies provide empirical evidence on the effect of intervention activities on social capital. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of participatory design and community engagement activities on social capital among urban informal settlements in Suva, Fiji and Makassar, Indonesia enrolled in the Revitalizing Informal Settlements and their Environments trial using the Short Adapted Social Capital Assessment Tool. We performed confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) to test tool performance and built structural equation models to assess intervention effect on CFA-informed, sub-scale scores for cognitive and structural social capital. Qualitative in-depth interviews in Fiji and Indonesia and focus group discussions in Fiji provided nuanced understanding of intervention effects on social capital from residents' perspectives. Results confirmed the hypothesized two-factor solution but revealed differences by country and by gender in Indonesia. The intervention appeared positively related to cognitive social capital among men and women in Indonesia and negatively related to cognitive and structural social capital among men and women in Fiji. While effect sizes were small and cluster-adjustment for a small number of settlements yielded non-significant effects, trends were consistent across models and bivariate analyses and were corroborated by qualitative findings. Several contextual factors may explain these results, including timing and duration of intervention activities and influence of COVID-19. Qualitative data suggested that the relationship between participatory design and social capital may be bidirectional, helping to explain why certain settlements appeared to be better equipped to benefit from intervention activities. Practitioners and program designers should carefully consider the social pre-conditions of communities in which they intend to work to optimize program outcomes and avoid unintended consequences.