CDH1 mutations are present in both ductal and lobular breast cancer, but promoter allelic variants show no detectable breast cancer risk
Mutations and diminished expression of the E‐cadherin gene (CDH1) have been identified in a number of epithelial malignancies. Although somatic CDH1 mutations were detected in lobular breast cancer with a frequency ranging from 10–56%, CDH1 alterations in more frequent ductal tumors appear to be rar...
Saved in:
Published in: | International journal of cancer Vol. 98; no. 2; pp. 199 - 204 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
New York
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company
10-03-2002
Wiley-Liss |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Mutations and diminished expression of the E‐cadherin gene (CDH1) have been identified in a number of epithelial malignancies. Although somatic CDH1 mutations were detected in lobular breast cancer with a frequency ranging from 10–56%, CDH1 alterations in more frequent ductal tumors appear to be rare. Here we have analyzed the coding region of CDH1 for mutations using denaturing high performance liquid chromatography and found 4 mutations in 83 ductal carcinomas (5%) and 3 mutations in 25 lobular carcinomas (12%). The germline of 13 patients with familial lobular tumors was also analyzed for mutations, but none were detected. In a case‐control study, we also tested whether a variant adenine allele in the promoter polymorphism −161C→A with a putative influence on the transcriptional activity of CDH1 in vitro confers any detectable risk of breast cancer. No significant difference in the allelic frequency between patients with breast cancer (326/1,152, 28.3%) and controls (190/696, 27.3%, p > 0.05; relative risk 1.05, 95% confidence interval 0.85–1.30) was found. A novel promoter polymorphism was identified at position −152, but the frequency of the variant cytosine allele was also similar in patients with breast cancer and controls (0.71% vs. 0.21%, p = 0.23). Transient transfection experiments using reporter constructs containing the nucleotide substitutions −161C/−152C and −161A/−152T showed only a slight decrease in the transcription activity compared to the wild‐type construct. These results do not support CDH1 as a prominent low‐penetrance cancer susceptibility gene, but indicate that CDH1 mutations contribute to the progression of both lobular and ductal tumors. © 2001 Wiley‐Liss, Inc. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | Fax: +46‐8‐6089269 ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0020-7136 1097-0215 |
DOI: | 10.1002/ijc.10176 |