Interlaboratory Verification of Silicon Nitride Tensile Creep Properties

Five laboratories tested NIST‐supplied, pin‐loaded, 76‐mm‐long tensile creep specimens at 1400°C under a 150 MPa load using flag‐based, laser extensometry. The laboratories reported failure time and strain and supplied the individual creep curves. Only one of the laboratories produced failure times...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of the American Ceramic Society Vol. 80; no. 4; pp. 831 - 838
Main Authors: Luecke, William E., Wiederhorn, Sheldon M.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Westerville, Ohio American Ceramics Society 01-04-1997
Blackwell
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Five laboratories tested NIST‐supplied, pin‐loaded, 76‐mm‐long tensile creep specimens at 1400°C under a 150 MPa load using flag‐based, laser extensometry. The laboratories reported failure time and strain and supplied the individual creep curves. Only one of the laboratories produced failure times that were significantly less than the others. It is likely that their reduced failure times resulted from small load calibration and test temperature errors. After steps were taken to ameliorate these problems, three additional tests yielded failure times that agreed with those of the other four laboratories. Although the times to failure from the four laboratories that initially agreed were statistically indistinguishable, their creep curves exhibited subtle differences. These differences probably arose because the laboratories used different gage length definitions. When we recalculated the creep curves to the same gage length definition, the differences between the four laboratories whose times to failure agreed, vanished. Although a number of the specimens exhibited edge chips, creep cracks, and obvious chemical interactions with the flags, the presence of these defects did not reduce the time or strain to failure. Two additional creep tests in our laboratory, using specimens that were grossly misaligned, yielded failure times and strains that were commensurate with those from well‐aligned specimens.
Bibliography:istex:0B5D678806322880A7BC2F4C509F5544A69B41C1
ArticleID:JACE831
ark:/67375/WNG-QFCR26F3-G
Member, American Ceramic Society.
The use of commercial designations or company names is for identification only and does not indicate endorsement by the National Institute of Standards and Technology.
Supported by the Ceramic Technology Project, DOE Office of Transportation Tech‐ nologies, under Contract No. DE‐AC05‐84OR21400 with Martin Marietta Energy Systems, Inc.
Manuscript No. 191688. Received July 9, 1996; approved September 24, 1996.
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0002-7820
1551-2916
DOI:10.1111/j.1151-2916.1997.tb02911.x