Sorghum flour fractions: Correlations among polysaccharides, phenolic compounds, antioxidant activity and glycemic index
•Sorghum flour fractions were classified as high and intermediate glycemic index.•Phenolics and antioxidant activities were negatively correlated to glycemic index.•Resistant starch had no correlation to estimated glycemic index. Nutrients composition, phenolic compounds, antioxidant activity and es...
Saved in:
Published in: | Food chemistry Vol. 180; pp. 116 - 123 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
England
Elsevier Ltd
01-08-2015
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | •Sorghum flour fractions were classified as high and intermediate glycemic index.•Phenolics and antioxidant activities were negatively correlated to glycemic index.•Resistant starch had no correlation to estimated glycemic index.
Nutrients composition, phenolic compounds, antioxidant activity and estimated glycemic index (EGI) were evaluated in sorghum bran (SB) and decorticated sorghum flour (DSF), obtained by a rice-polisher, as well as whole sorghum flour (WSF). Correlation between EGI and the studied parameters were determined. SB presented the highest protein, lipid, ash, β-glucan, total and insoluble dietary fiber contents; and the lowest non-resistant and total starch contents. The highest carbohydrate and resistant starch contents were in DSF and WSF, respectively. Phenolic compounds and antioxidant activities were concentrated in SB. The EGI values were: DSF 84.5±0.41; WSF 77.2±0.33; and SB 60.3±0.78. Phenolic compounds, specific flavonoids and antioxidant activities, as well as total, insoluble and soluble dietary fiber and β-glucans of sorghum flour samples were all negatively correlated to EGI. RS content was not correlated to EGI. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0308-8146 1873-7072 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.02.023 |