Rabies post-exposure prophylaxis in Germany − What are the challenges?

• Published in: Epidemiology and infection Vol. 149; p. e119
• Main Authors: Meyerhoff, P., Manekeller, S., Saleh, N., Boesecke, C., Schlabe, S., Wasmuth, J.C., van Bremen, K., Eis-Hübinger, A.M., von Fischer-Treuenfeld, J., Menting, T., Rockstroh, J.K., Schwarze-Zander, C.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press 18-03-2021
• Subjects: Animal bites; Disease prevention; Documentation; Exposure; Guidelines; Hospitals; Immunization; Indication; Infectious diseases; Original Paper; Patients; Physicians; Prophylaxis; Rabies; Terrestrial environments; Tetanus; Travel; Vaccination; Vaccines; Wounds; Asia; Europe; Germany; Africa; R-PEP; Rabies
• ISSN: 0950-2688; 1469-4409
• DOI: 10.1017/S0950268821000601

Rabies post-exposure prophylaxis (R-PEP) including wound treatment, vaccination and application of rabies immunoglobulin (RIG) is essential in preventing rabies mortality. Today, Germany is officially declared free from terrestrial rabies and rabies is only found in bats. However, physicians in A&E Departments are frequently consulted on the need for R-PEP. We retrospectively analysed patients who received R-PEP at the A&E Department of the University Hospital Bonn between 01.01.2013 and 30.06.2019. Demographic data, travel history, clinical and laboratory findings, previous rabies vaccinations and R-PEP vaccination regimen were recorded. During the study period, 90 patients received R-PEP at the University Hospital Bonn, in 10 cases without indication for R-PEP. Altogether, we found deviations from R-PEP guidelines in 51% (n = 41/80). Infiltration of RIG was missed in 12 patients and incorrectly administrated in 24 patients. Furthermore, vaccination scheme was incorrect in 11 patients. Correct wound washing and documentation of tetanus status was missing in 14% and 63% of patients, respectively. Despite rabies elimination in Germany patients frequently seek advice for R-PEP, the majority returning from foreign travel. Our data show that there is a high need for education on indication for R-PEP before and after travel and for implementation of precise R-PEP guidelines in daily clinical practice.