Comparative assessment of HPHC yields in the Tobacco Heating System THS2.2 and commercial cigarettes
There has been a sustained effort in recent years to develop products with the potential to present less risk compared with continued smoking as an alternative for adult smokers who would otherwise continue to smoke cigarettes. During the non-clinical assessment phase of such products, the chemical...
Saved in:
Published in: | Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology Vol. 90; pp. 1 - 8 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Netherlands
Elsevier Inc
01-11-2017
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | There has been a sustained effort in recent years to develop products with the potential to present less risk compared with continued smoking as an alternative for adult smokers who would otherwise continue to smoke cigarettes. During the non-clinical assessment phase of such products, the chemical composition and toxicity of their aerosols are frequently compared to the chemical composition and toxicity of the smoke from a standard research cigarette – the 3R4F reference cigarette. In the present study, it is demonstrated that results of these analytical comparisons are similar when considering commercially available cigarette products worldwide. A market mean reduction of about 90% is observed on average across a broad range of harmful and potentially harmful constituents (HPHC) measured in the aerosol of a candidate modified risk tobacco product, the Tobacco Heating System 2.2 (THS2.2), compared against the levels of HPHC of cigarettes representative of selected markets; this mean reduction is well in line with the reduction observed against 3R4F smoke constituents in previous studies.
•HPHC in THS 2.2 aerosol reduced by 90% in comparison with commercial cigarettes.•Same level observed for 3R4F.•3R4F is a reasonable comparator for the assessment of THS 2.2. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0273-2300 1096-0295 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.yrtph.2017.08.006 |