Interpretation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis antigen-specific IFN-γ release assays (T-SPOT.TB) and factors that may modulate test results

Summary Background Data about T cell antigen-specific (ESAT-6 and CFP-10) IFN-γ release assays (IGRAs) during and after completion of anti-tuberculous (TB) treatment are limited and highly discordant. Thus, the utility of IGRAs as a surrogate marker of mycobacterial burden remain unclear. Methods To...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of infection Vol. 55; no. 2; pp. 169 - 173
Main Authors: Dheda, K, Pooran, A, Pai, M, Miller, R.F, Lesley, K, Booth, H.L, Scott, G.M, Akbar, A.N, Zumla, A, Rook, G.A
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Kidlington Elsevier Ltd 01-08-2007
Elsevier
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Summary Background Data about T cell antigen-specific (ESAT-6 and CFP-10) IFN-γ release assays (IGRAs) during and after completion of anti-tuberculous (TB) treatment are limited and highly discordant. Thus, the utility of IGRAs as a surrogate marker of mycobacterial burden remain unclear. Methods To investigate factors that modulate IGRA responses during anti-TB treatment we used a standardised assay (T-SPOT.TB) in 33 patients with culture positive tuberculosis. Results Significantly more patients in the early (≤4 months of anti-TB treatment) rather than the late phase (>4 months or completed anti-TB treatment) had positive IGRA responses [10/12 (83%) vs 4/21 (19%); p ≤ 0.01]. Thus, 17/21 (81%) in the late phase or who had completed treatment (mean duration of treatment = 8.7 months) were IGRA negative, despite having robust antigen-specific recall proliferative responses. In these 17 patients prolonged incubation (5 days vs overnight), use of different antigen preparations (protein vs peptide) and addition of endotoxin, failed to elicit positive responses. Conclusions In treated TB patients the discordant IGRA data remain unexplained by variation in laboratory protocols and are more likely due to host or environmental factors. In a low burden setting IGRAs may be a promising surrogate marker of mycobacterial disease burden.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0163-4453
1532-2742
DOI:10.1016/j.jinf.2007.02.005