Patterns of paternal investment predict cross-cultural variation in jealous response

• Published in: Nature human behaviour Vol. 4; no. 1; pp. 20 - 26
• Main Authors: Scelza, Brooke A., Prall, Sean P., Blumenfield, Tami, Crittenden, Alyssa N., Gurven, Michael, Kline, Michelle, Koster, Jeremy, Kushnick, Geoff, Mattison, Siobhán M., Pillsworth, Elizabeth, Shenk, Mary K., Starkweather, Kathrine, Stieglitz, Jonathan, Sum, Chun-Yi, Yamaguchi, Kyoko, McElreath, Richard
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London Nature Publishing Group UK 01-01-2020; Nature Publishing Group
• Subjects: 4014/19/2471; 4014/477/2811; Adult; Adultery; Anthropology; Behavior; Behavioral Sciences; Biomedical and Life Sciences; Cross cultural studies; Cross-Cultural Comparison; Culture; Experimental Psychology; Extramarital Relations - psychology; Female; Gender differences; Humans; Infidelity; Investment theory; Investments; Jealousy; Letter; Life history; Life Sciences; Male; Microeconomics; Neurosciences; Parent-Child Relations; Partnerships; Personality and Social Psychology; Sex differences; Sex Factors; Sexual Partners - psychology; Social norms; Women
• ISSN: 2397-3374; 2397-3374
• DOI: 10.1038/s41562-019-0654-y

Long-lasting, romantic partnerships are a universal feature of human societies, but almost as ubiquitous is the risk of instability when one partner strays. Jealous response to the threat of infidelity is well studied, but most empirical work on the topic has focused on a proposed sex difference in the type of jealousy (sexual or emotional) that men and women find most upsetting, rather than on how jealous response varies
1
,
2
. This stems in part from the predominance of studies using student samples from industrialized populations, which represent a relatively homogenous group in terms of age, life history stage and social norms
3
,
4
. To better understand variation in jealous response, we conducted a 2-part study in 11 populations (1,048 individuals). In line with previous work, we find a robust sex difference in the classic forced-choice jealousy task. However, we also show substantial variation in jealous response across populations. Using parental investment theory, we derived several predictions about what might trigger such variation. We find that greater paternal investment and lower frequency of extramarital sex are associated with more severe jealous response. Thus, partner jealousy appears to be a facultative response, reflective of the variable risks and costs of men’s investment across societies.
Using data from a cross-cultural study of 11 populations, Scelza et al. demonstrate the facultative nature of jealous response, driven in part by the extent of paternal investment in a particular population.