Serum soluble interleukin 2 receptor (sIL-2R) as a marker of acute rejection in renal transplant children
García‐Roca P, Vargas YA, Fuentes Y, Hernández AM, Ortiz L, Valverde S, Velásquez‐Jones L, Romero‐Navarro B, Ramón‐Garcia G, Medeiros M. Serum soluble interleukin 2 receptor (sIL‐2R) as a marker of acute rejection in renal transplant children. : The aim of the study was to evaluate whether or not s...
Saved in:
Published in: | Pediatric transplantation Vol. 16; no. 3; pp. 274 - 279 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Oxford, UK
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01-05-2012
Blackwell |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | García‐Roca P, Vargas YA, Fuentes Y, Hernández AM, Ortiz L, Valverde S, Velásquez‐Jones L, Romero‐Navarro B, Ramón‐Garcia G, Medeiros M. Serum soluble interleukin 2 receptor (sIL‐2R) as a marker of acute rejection in renal transplant children.
: The aim of the study was to evaluate whether or not serum levels of soluble interleukin 2 receptor (sIL‐2R) predict acute rejection in pediatric recipients. We studied 51 pediatric renal transplant recipients divided into three groups: Group 1) Biopsy‐proven cellular acute rejection (n = 19), Group 2) Graft dysfunction with histological diagnosis other than acute rejection (n = 8) and Group 3) Patients with stable graft function, no biopsy (n = 24). Serum samples for sIL‐2R measurement by sandwich ELISA were obtained at the time of renal transplant and at the time of renal biopsy due to graft dysfunction (Groups 1 and 2) or at six months post‐transplant in the case of Group 3. The mean ± s.e. serum values of sIL‐2R were higher in patients during acute rejection (6539 ± 1802 pg/mL) compared to patients with other causes of graft dysfunction (2217 ± 256 pg/mL) or stable graft function at six months (2183 ± 283 pg/mL) (Kruskal–Wallis p = 0.004). When the sIL2‐R levels at the time of transplant were compared to those at the time of biopsy (Groups 1 and 2) or at six months post‐transplant in Group 3, there was no significant difference between baseline and biopsy in the acute rejection group (paired t‐test = 0.07), whereas there was a significant reduction in Groups 2 and 3. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | istex:2E8FFD8401939A32F49DF362F7D0289B44FA1040 ArticleID:PETR1645 ark:/67375/WNG-Z15JXLGS-4 ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 |
ISSN: | 1397-3142 1399-3046 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1399-3046.2012.01645.x |