Non-linear increase in GLP-1 levels in response to DPP-IV inhibition in healthy adult subjects

Aim:  Dipeptidyl peptidase‐IV (DPP‐IV) inhibitors represent a new promising therapeutic intervention for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of DPP‐IV inhibition by PF‐00734200, a potent competitive DPP‐IV inhibitor, on the dynamics of DPP‐...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Diabetes, obesity & metabolism Vol. 10; no. 6; pp. 506 - 513
Main Authors: Dai, Haiqinq, Gustavson, Stephanie M., Preston, Gregory M., Eskra, James D., Calle, Roberto, Hirshberg, Boaz
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01-06-2008
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Aim:  Dipeptidyl peptidase‐IV (DPP‐IV) inhibitors represent a new promising therapeutic intervention for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of DPP‐IV inhibition by PF‐00734200, a potent competitive DPP‐IV inhibitor, on the dynamics of DPP‐IV activity and glucagon‐like peptide‐1 (GLP‐1) kinetics in healthy adult subjects. Methods:  This was a prospective randomized, crossover, placebo‐controlled, ascending, single, oral dose study conducted at a clinical research centre. Twenty‐seven healthy adult subjects were randomized to receive placebo or PF‐00734200 with doses ranging from 0.3 to 300 mg (n = 9 per dose group). Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic end points (DPP‐IV activity and GLP‐1) were measured prior to, and various times after, dosing. Results:  PF‐00734200 was well tolerated in all subjects. Pharmacokinetics (PK) data indicate that the drug was rapidly absorbed and declined in a biphasic fashion. Mean maximum concentration and area under concentration curve appeared to increase with doses proportionally. DPP‐IV inhibition increased with PF‐00734200 concentrations, which can be described by an Emax model with EC50 approximately being 14 ng/ml. DPP‐IV inhibition led to greater GLP‐1 level accumulation compared with placebo. Plasma GLP‐1 levels stimulated by meals were augmented by DPP‐IV inhibition. However, the increase in GLP‐1 with DPP‐IV inhibition was non‐linear and maximized at 10 mg, a dose which resulted in about 75% weighted average DPP‐IV inhibition over 24 h and a 2.3‐fold increase in GLP‐1 over placebo. Moreover, even with near complete inhibition of DPP‐IV for over 24 h at the highest PF‐00734200 dose levels, the GLP‐1 levels actually declined during the night compared with postdinner levels. Conclusion:  DPP‐IV inhibition by PF‐00734200 resulted in a non‐linear increase in plasma GLP‐1 level, suggesting GLP‐1 levels may be limited by meal stimulus or by production capacity. In addition, GLP‐1 level declined even during maximal DPP‐IV inhibition, suggesting that there may be additional pathways of GLP‐1 elimination other than DPP‐IV enzymatic breakdown.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-J8NRXGFQ-F
istex:D6DF90A543120C53109C44C56C88ECDB6F919FDA
ArticleID:DOM742
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-News-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ISSN:1462-8902
1463-1326
DOI:10.1111/j.1463-1326.2007.00742.x