Analysis of red autofluorescence (650-670nm) in epidermal cell populations and its potential for distinguishing contributors to 'touch' biological samples [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
Interpretation of touch DNA mixtures poses a significant challenge for forensic caseworking laboratories. Front end techniques that facilitate separation of contributor cell populations before DNA extraction are a way to circumvent this problem. The goal of this study was to survey intrinsic fluore...
Saved in:
Published in: | F1000 research Vol. 5; p. 180 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
England
Faculty of 1000 Ltd
2016
F1000Research F1000 Research Ltd |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Interpretation of touch DNA mixtures poses a significant challenge for forensic caseworking laboratories. Front end techniques that facilitate separation of contributor cell populations before DNA extraction are a way to circumvent this problem. The goal of this study was to survey intrinsic fluorescence of epidermal cells collected from touch surfaces and investigate whether this property could potentially be used to discriminate between contributor cell populations in a biological mixture. Analysis of red autofluorescence (650-670nm) showed that some contributors could be distinguished on this basis. Variation was also observed between autofluorescence profiles of epidermal cell populations from a single contributor sampled on different days. This dataset suggests that red autofluorescence may be a useful marker for identifying distinct cell populations in some mixtures. Future efforts should continue to investigate the extrinsic or intrinsic factors contributing to this signature, and to identify additional biomarkers that could complement this system. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 CE conceived the study. CE, CS, KP, EB, and YK designed the experiments. CS, EB, YK carried out the research. KP assisted with data analysis and provided expertise in the area of forensic casework. CE, CS, and KP prepared the first draft of the manuscript. All authors were involved in the revision of the draft manuscript and have agreed to the final content. Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed. |
ISSN: | 2046-1402 2046-1402 |
DOI: | 10.12688/f1000research.8036.1 |