Cooperation, motivation and social balance

•Our premise is that people have multiple, discrete, and context-dependent motives.•Our novel approach explains variation in cooperation across settings and people.•We analyze the endogenous determinants of people's types and motives.•The distribution of settings and incentives affect the balan...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of economic behavior & organization Vol. 126; pp. 72 - 94
Main Authors: Bosworth, Steven J., Singer, Tania, Snower, Dennis J.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Amsterdam Elsevier B.V 01-06-2016
Elsevier Sequoia S.A
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•Our premise is that people have multiple, discrete, and context-dependent motives.•Our novel approach explains variation in cooperation across settings and people.•We analyze the endogenous determinants of people's types and motives.•The distribution of settings and incentives affect the balance of motives and types.•Our analysis thereby yields novel policy implications. This paper examines the reflexive interplay between individual decisions and social forces to analyze the evolution of cooperation in the presence of “multi-directedness,” whereby people's preferences depend on their psychological motives. People have access to multiple, discrete motives. Different motives may be activated by different social settings. Inter-individual differences in dispositional types affect the responsiveness of people's motives to their social settings. The evolution of these dispositional types is driven by changes in the frequencies of social settings. In this context, economic policies can influence economic decisions not merely by modifying incentives operating through given preferences, but also by influencing people's motives (thereby changing their preferences) and by changing the distribution of dispositional types in the population (thereby changing their motivational responsiveness to social settings).
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0167-2681
1879-1751
DOI:10.1016/j.jebo.2015.12.005