Fate of Nitrogen-15 in a Perennial Ryegrass Seed Field and Herbaceous Riparian Area
Intensive management of grass seed fields in the poorly drained soils of the Willamette Valley, Oregon, has prompted concern in the capacity of these landscapes and their associated minimally managed riparian areas to process and retain fertilizer N. Our goal was to determine the extent of N losses...
Saved in:
Published in: | Soil Science Society of America journal Vol. 70; no. 3; pp. 909 - 919 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Madison
Soil Science Society
01-05-2006
Soil Science Society of America American Society of Agronomy |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Intensive management of grass seed fields in the poorly drained soils of the Willamette Valley, Oregon, has prompted concern in the capacity of these landscapes and their associated minimally managed riparian areas to process and retain fertilizer N. Our goal was to determine the extent of N losses and effectiveness of a riparian area and an adjacent perennial ryegrass seed field to retain N. The fate of fertilizer ¹⁵NH₄ and ¹⁵NO₃ was determined with a ¹⁵N tracer experiment. During the second year of the study, ¹⁵N recovery in the plant and soil (0-30 cm) from the cropping system was 51% for ¹⁵NH₄ and 43% for ¹⁵NO₃ whereas recovery in the riparian area was only 20% of ¹⁵NH₄ and 31% of ¹⁵NO₃. Greater cropping system retention of ¹⁵N resulted from both greater uptake by the crop and greater retention of ¹⁵N in the soil. Low recovery of ¹⁵N in the riparian area was possibly the result of two significant spring flood events saturating the surface soil of the riparian area but not the cropping system. The prolonged seasonal saturated conditions significantly reduced riparian plant biomass production and N uptake and increased the potential of N loss through overland flow and denitrification. Results indicate that the cropping system had larger available N pools and a larger potential to retain fertilizer N than the riparian zone. However, both areas were prone to substantial loss of applied N. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | http://hdl.handle.net/10113/4175 http://dx.doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2005.0223 ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1 |
ISSN: | 0361-5995 1435-0661 |
DOI: | 10.2136/sssaj2005.0223 |