Developing and testing an environmental economics approach to the valuation and application of urban health externalities

• Published in: Frontiers in public health Vol. 11; p. 1070200
• Main Authors: Eaton, Eleanor, Hunt, Alistair, Black, Daniel
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 17-02-2023
• Subjects: decision-making; environmental economics; health; Parks, Recreational; planning; Policy; Public Health; Quality of Life; Systematic Reviews as Topic; urban development; Urban Health; planning; environmental economics; health; decision-making; urban development
• ISSN: 2296-2565; 2296-2565
• DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1070200

Poor quality urban environments have substantial impacts on public and planetary health. These costs to society are not readily quantifiable and remain largely external to mainstream measures of progress. Methods for accounting for these externalities exist, but their effective application is in development. Yet there is an increasing urgency and demand given the profound threats to quality of life both now and in the future.
We combine data from a series of systematic reviews of the quantitative evidence linking characteristics of the urban environment with health consequences and the economic valuation of these health impacts from a societal perspective within a spreadsheet-based tool. The tool-named HAUS-allows the user to estimate the health impacts of changes in urban environments. The economic valuation of these impacts in turn facilitates the use of such data in broader economic appraisal of urban development projects and policies.
Using the Impact-Pathway approach, observations of a variety of health impacts associated with 28 characteristics of the urban environment are applied to forecast changes in cases of specific health impacts that result from changes in urban contexts. Unit values for the societal cost of 78 health outcomes are estimated and incorporated in the HAUS model in order to allow the quantification of the potential effect size of a given change in the urban environment. Headline results are presented for a real-world application in which urban development scenarios that have varying quantities of green space are evaluated. The potential uses of the tool are validated
formal semi-structured interviews with 15 senior decision-makers from the public and private sectors.
Responses suggest that there is significant demand for this kind of evidence, that it is valued despite the inherent uncertainties, and has a very wide range of potential applications. Analysis of the results suggest expert interpretation and contextual understanding is critical for the value of evidence to be realized. More development and testing is needed to understand how and where it may be possible to apply effectively in real world practice.