Evaluation of patient safety culture: comparative study in university hospitals

To conduct a benchmarking comparison of the composites of patient safety culture based on the evaluation of Brazilian and Portuguese nurses working in university hospitals. Quantitative, cross-sectional, comparative survey. Data collected between April and December 2014, in two teaching hospitals, a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P Vol. 52; p. e03379
Main Authors: Fassarella, Cintia Silva, Camerini, Flávia Giron, Henrique, Danielle de Mendonça, Almeida, Luana Ferreira de, Figueiredo, Maria do Céu Barbieri
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Brazil Universidade de São Paulo, Escola de Enfermagem 01-11-2018
SciELO
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:To conduct a benchmarking comparison of the composites of patient safety culture based on the evaluation of Brazilian and Portuguese nurses working in university hospitals. Quantitative, cross-sectional, comparative survey. Data collected between April and December 2014, in two teaching hospitals, applying the instrument Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture, in the versions translated and adapted to the countries. 762 nurses distributed in four services participated in the study, 195 Brazilians and 567 Portuguese. Seven of the 12 composites of safety culture showed significant differences between hospitals. The highlights were those related to: "management support for patient safety" (±17); "handoffs and transitions" (±15); "teamwork across units" (±14); and "overall perceptions of patient safety" (±10). The dimension that had the highest significant difference between the studied institutions was "management support for patient safety". These data may support the managers of the study hospitals, enabling continuous improvements and advancements.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0080-6234
1980-220X
1980-220X
DOI:10.1590/S1980-220X2017033803379