Quality of life from cytoreductive surgery in advanced ovarian cancer: Investigating the association between disease burden and surgical complexity in the international, prospective, SOCQER‐2 cohort study

Objective To investigate quality of life (QoL) and association with surgical complexity and disease burden after surgical resection for advanced ovarian cancer in centres with variation in surgical approach. Design Prospective multicentre observational study. Setting Gynaecological cancer surgery ce...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Vol. 129; no. 7; pp. 1122 - 1132
Main Authors: Sundar, Sudha, Cummins, Carole, Kumar, Satyam, Long, Joanna, Arora, Vivek, Balega, Janos, Broadhead, Tim, Duncan, Tim, Edmondson, Richard, Fotopoulou, Christina, Glasspool, Ros, Kolomainen, Desiree, Leeson, Simon, Manchanda, Ranjit, McNally, Orla, Morrison, Jo, Mukhopadhyay, Asima, Paul, Jim, Tidy, John, Wood, Nick
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: England Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01-06-2022
John Wiley and Sons Inc
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objective To investigate quality of life (QoL) and association with surgical complexity and disease burden after surgical resection for advanced ovarian cancer in centres with variation in surgical approach. Design Prospective multicentre observational study. Setting Gynaecological cancer surgery centres in the UK, Kolkata, India, and Melbourne, Australia. Sample Patients undergoing surgical resection (with low, intermediate or high surgical complexity score, SCS) for late‐stage ovarian cancer. Main Outcome Measures Primary: change in global score on the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) core quality‐of‐life questionnaire (QLQ‐C30). Secondary: EORTC ovarian cancer module (OV28), progression‐free survival. Results Patients’ preoperative disease burden and SCS varied between centres, confirming differences in surgical ethos. QoL response rates were 90% up to 18 months. Mean change from the pre‐surgical baseline in the EORTC QLQ‐C30 was 3.4 (SD 1.8, n = 88) in the low, 4.0 (SD 2.1, n = 55) in the intermediate and 4.3 (SD 2.1, n = 52) in the high‐SCS group after 6 weeks (p = 0.048), and 4.3 (SD 2.1, n = 51), 5.1 (SD 2.2, n = 41) and 5.1 (SD 2.2, n = 35), respectively, after 12 months (p = 0.133). In a repeated‐measures model, there were no clinically or statistically meaningful differences in EORTC QLQ‐C30 global scores between the three SCS groups (p = 0.840), but there was a small statistically significant improvement in all groups over time (p < 0.001). The high‐SCS group experienced small to moderate decreases in physical (p = 0.004), role (p = 0.016) and emotional (p = 0.001) function at 6 weeks post‐surgery, which resolved by 6–12 months. Conclusions The global QoL of patients undergoing low‐, intermediate‐ and high‐SCS surgery improved at 12 months after surgery and was no worse in patients undergoing extensive surgery. Tweetable Compared with surgery of lower complexity, extensive surgery does not result in poorer quality of life in patients with advanced ovarian cancer. Tweetable Compared with surgery of lower complexity, extensive surgery does not result in poorer quality of life in patients with advanced ovarian cancer.
Bibliography:Funding information
SOCQER2 study in the UK was commissioned and funded by the National Institute of Health and Care excellence. The funder had no role in interpretation of results from the study. The SOCQERoOZ study, conducted at Royal Women's Hospital and Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre in Melbourne, received research grant from Australian Society of Gynaecologic Oncologists Inc. The SOCQER2 India study is part funded by the Department of Science Technology, India ‐ UKIERI grant and Jiv Daya Foundation, USA
Sudha Sundar and Carole Cummins are joint first authors.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:1470-0328
1471-0528
DOI:10.1111/1471-0528.17041