Double contrast-enhanced ultrasound improves the detection and localization of occult lesions in the pancreatic tail: a initial experience report

• Published in: Abdominal radiology (New York) Vol. 44; no. 2; pp. 559 - 567
• Main Authors: Zhu, Wei, Mai, Gang, Zhou, Xiang, Song, Bin
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: New York Springer US 01-02-2019
• Subjects: Adult; Contrast Media; Female; Gastroenterology; Hepatology; Humans; Image Enhancement - methods; Imaging; Male; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Middle Aged; NEOPLASMS; NMR IMAGING; PANCREAS; Pancreas - diagnostic imaging; Pancreatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging; PATIENTS; Radiology; RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE; Reproducibility of Results; SENSITIVITY; Sensitivity and Specificity; SPECIFICITY; ULTRASONOGRAPHY; Ultrasonography - methods; Pancreatic tail tumor; Double contrast-enhanced ultrasound; Contrast-enhanced ultrasound; Contrast-enhanced MRI
• ISSN: 2366-004X; 2366-0058; 2366-0058
• DOI: 10.1007/s00261-018-1746-2

Purpose
The aim of this study is to review our initial experience of Double contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (DCEUS) in the preoperative detection of pancreatic tail occult tumors.
Methods
Thirty-five patients were recruited to undergo DCEUS of the pancreas suspected by occult lesions of pancreatic with MRI or clinical evidence. The radiologists assessed the images (conventional US, DCEUS, and MRI) for enhancement phases, tumor presence, location, enhancement characteristics, and tumor conspicuity. The differences in the onset times of the phases between DCEUS and MRI were noted. Tumor conspicuity was graded on a four-point scale for conspicuity comparison among three imaging modalities.
Results
Pancreatic tail tumors were missed on conventional transabdominal US in 11 of 35 patients. DCEUS revealed 12 lesions of 35 patients. Pancreatic tail tumors were identified on MRI in 10 of 35 patients. The sensitivity and specificity of DCEUS for depicting occult lesions of ≤ 2.2 cm were 92% and 95%, respectively. In contrast, the sensitivity and specificity of conventional US were 67% and 66%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of MRI were 91% and 88%, respectively. The conspicuity ratings of the three phases did not significantly differ between the DCEUS and MRI groups (
P
 > 0.05). The DCEUS phases started much earlier than the corresponding MRI phases.
Conclusion
DCEUS is a promising technique in the detection of occult pancreatic tail tumors and is possibly superior to dynamic enhanced MRI in the case of some peripheral lesions.