Changing climates of conflict A social network experiment in 56 schools

Theories of human behavior suggest that individuals attend to the behavior of certain people in their community to understand what is socially normative and adjust their own behavior in response. An experiment tested these theories by randomizing an anticonflict intervention across 56 schools with 2...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS Vol. 113; no. 3; pp. 566 - 571
Main Authors: Paluck, Elizabeth Levy, Shepherd, Hana, Aronow, Peter M.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States National Academy of Sciences 19-01-2016
National Acad Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Theories of human behavior suggest that individuals attend to the behavior of certain people in their community to understand what is socially normative and adjust their own behavior in response. An experiment tested these theories by randomizing an anticonflict intervention across 56 schools with 24,191 students. After comprehensively measuring every school’s social network, randomly selected seed groups of 20–32 students from randomly selected schools were assigned to an intervention that encouraged their public stance against conflict at school. Compared with control schools, disciplinary reports of student conflict at treatment schools were reduced by 30% over 1 year. The effect was stronger when the seed group contained more “social referent” students who, as network measures reveal, attract more student attention. Network analyses of peer-to-peer influence show that social referents spread perceptions of conflict as less socially normative.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-News-2
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
Author contributions: E.L.P., H.S., and P.M.A. designed research; E.L.P. and H.S. performed research; P.M.A. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; E.L.P., H.S., and P.M.A. analyzed data; and E.L.P., H.S., and P.M.A. wrote the paper.
Edited by Kenneth W. Wachter, University of California, Berkeley, CA, and approved November 20, 2015 (received for review July 22, 2015)
ISSN:0027-8424
1091-6490
DOI:10.1073/pnas.1514483113