Research on the Relationship Between High-Commitment Work Systems and Employees' Unethical Pro-organizational Behavior: The Moderating Role of Balanced Reciprocity Beliefs

Based on the social exchange theory, this paper explores the indirect impact of high-commitment work systems on employees' unethical pro-organizational behavior. Through the analysis of multisource data from 139 companies (including 139 human resource managers and 966 employees), a multilevel s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Frontiers in psychology Vol. 12; p. 776904
Main Authors: Zhang, Min, Zhao, Lijing, Chen, Zhihong
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 13-12-2021
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Based on the social exchange theory, this paper explores the indirect impact of high-commitment work systems on employees' unethical pro-organizational behavior. Through the analysis of multisource data from 139 companies (including 139 human resource managers and 966 employees), a multilevel structuring equation model is used to verify the study's hypotheses. The research results show the following findings: (1) High-commitment work systems are significantly positively related to employees' unethical pro-organizational behavior. (2) High-commitment work systems have indirect effects on the employees' unethical pro-organizational behavior through the relational psychological contract. The relational psychological contract plays a mediating role in this process. (3) Employees' balanced reciprocity beliefs significantly enhance the positive effect of relational psychological contracts on employees' unethical pro-organizational behavior. It can also positively moderate the mediating effect of high-commitment work systems that affect employees' unethical pro-organizational behavior relational psychological contract.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
This article was submitted to Organizational Psychology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology
Reviewed by: Tomasz Gigol, Warsaw School of Economics, Poland; Muhammad Zada, Henan University, China
Edited by: Hongdan Zhao, Shanghai University, China
ISSN:1664-1078
1664-1078
DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.776904