Research on the Relationship Between High-Commitment Work Systems and Employees' Unethical Pro-organizational Behavior: The Moderating Role of Balanced Reciprocity Beliefs
Based on the social exchange theory, this paper explores the indirect impact of high-commitment work systems on employees' unethical pro-organizational behavior. Through the analysis of multisource data from 139 companies (including 139 human resource managers and 966 employees), a multilevel s...
Saved in:
Published in: | Frontiers in psychology Vol. 12; p. 776904 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Switzerland
Frontiers Media S.A
13-12-2021
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Based on the social exchange theory, this paper explores the indirect impact of high-commitment work systems on employees' unethical pro-organizational behavior. Through the analysis of multisource data from 139 companies (including 139 human resource managers and 966 employees), a multilevel structuring equation model is used to verify the study's hypotheses. The research results show the following findings: (1) High-commitment work systems are significantly positively related to employees' unethical pro-organizational behavior. (2) High-commitment work systems have indirect effects on the employees' unethical pro-organizational behavior through the relational psychological contract. The relational psychological contract plays a mediating role in this process. (3) Employees' balanced reciprocity beliefs significantly enhance the positive effect of relational psychological contracts on employees' unethical pro-organizational behavior. It can also positively moderate the mediating effect of high-commitment work systems that affect employees' unethical pro-organizational behavior
relational psychological contract. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 This article was submitted to Organizational Psychology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology Reviewed by: Tomasz Gigol, Warsaw School of Economics, Poland; Muhammad Zada, Henan University, China Edited by: Hongdan Zhao, Shanghai University, China |
ISSN: | 1664-1078 1664-1078 |
DOI: | 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.776904 |