Effect of shading on physiological attributes and comparative transcriptome analysis of Camellia sinensis cultivar reveals tolerance mechanisms to low temperatures

Tea is a vital beverage crop all over the world, including in China. Low temperatures restrict its growth, development, and terrestrial distribution, and cold event variability worsens cold damage. However, the physiological and molecular mechanisms of under shade in winter remain unclear. In our st...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Frontiers in plant science Vol. 14; p. 1114988
Main Authors: Zaman, Shah, Shen, Jiazhi, Wang, Shuangshuang, Song, Dapeng, Wang, Hui, Ding, Shibo, Pang, Xu, Wang, Mengqi, Sabir, Irfan Ali, Wang, Yu, Ding, Zhaotang
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 02-02-2023
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Tea is a vital beverage crop all over the world, including in China. Low temperatures restrict its growth, development, and terrestrial distribution, and cold event variability worsens cold damage. However, the physiological and molecular mechanisms of under shade in winter remain unclear. In our study, tea leaves were utilized for physiological attributes and transcriptome analysis in November and December in three shading groups and no-shade control plants. When compared to the no-shade control plants, the shading group protected tea leaves from cold damage, increased photochemical efficiency (Fv/Fm) and soil plant analysis development (SPAD), and sustained chlorophyll , chlorophyll , chlorophyll, and carotenoid contents by physiological mean. Then, transcriptome analysis revealed 20,807 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and transcription factors (TFs) in November and December. A comparative study of transcriptome resulted in 3,523 DEGs and many TFs under SD0% SD30%, SD0% SD60%, and SD0% SD75% of shading in November and December. Statistically, 114 DEGs were downregulated and 72 were upregulated under SD0% SD30%. SD0% SD60% resulted in 154 DEGs, with 60 downregulated and 94 upregulated. Similarly, there were 505 DEGs of which 244 were downregulated and 263 were upregulated under SD0% SD75% of shading throughout November. However, 279 DEGs were downregulated and 105 were upregulated under SD0% SD30%. SD0% SD60% resulted in 296 DEGs, with 172 downregulated and 124 upregulated. Finally, 2,173 DEGs were regulated in December, with 1,428 downregulated and 745 upregulated under SD0% SD75%. These indicate that the number of downregulated DEGs in December was higher than the number of upregulated DEGs in November during low temperatures. Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analyses of differentially expressed genes were highly regulated in the photosynthesis, plant hormone signal transduction, and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathways. However, qRT-PCR and RNA-seq relative expression of photosynthetic (DEGs) in both November and December, plant hormone (DEGs) and in November and and in December, and key DEGs of MAPK signal transduction , , and in November and , , and in December in three shading groups and no-shade control plants responded to tea cold tolerance. The enhanced expression of light-harvesting photosystem I gene , light-harvesting photosystem II gene , and mitogen-activated protein kinases and enhance the cold-tolerance mechanism of . These comprehensive transcriptomic findings are significant for furthering our understanding of the genes and underlying regulatory mechanisms of shade-mediated low-temperature stress tolerance in horticultural crops.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
This article was submitted to Plant Bioinformatics, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science
Reviewed by: Zhiyuan Li, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS), China; Rahat Sharif, Yangzhou University, China; Qi Wang, Tobacco Research Institute (CAAS), China
Edited by: Xiaoxu Li, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS), China
ISSN:1664-462X
1664-462X
DOI:10.3389/fpls.2023.1114988