The Relationship Between Motivation, Goal Orientation, and Perceived Autonomy Support From the Coach in Young Norwegian Elite Hockey Players

This study investigates the relationship between motivation, goal orientation, and perceived autonomy support from the coach among junior elite hockey players. The study is based upon the theory of self-determination and the goal orientation theory. The first aim of the study was to investigate whet...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Frontiers in psychology Vol. 13; p. 811154
Main Author: Jakobsen, Arne M
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 16-02-2022
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This study investigates the relationship between motivation, goal orientation, and perceived autonomy support from the coach among junior elite hockey players. The study is based upon the theory of self-determination and the goal orientation theory. The first aim of the study was to investigate whether high scores on task involvement and perceived autonomy support from the coach may explain the intrinsic motivation of the players. Secondly, we sought to discover whether the most autonomous extrinsic motives may be explained by high scores on task involvement and perceived autonomy support from the coach. Lastly, we investigated whether the most controlling extrinsic motives may be explained by greater ego involvement or by both ego and task involvement and less perceived autonomy support from the coach. A total of 401 players aged 14-18 took part in the survey. The results show that intrinsic motivation can be explained by high scores on both task and ego involvement. The two most autonomous extrinsic motives-integrated and identified regulation-were both explained by task and ego involvement and perceived autonomy support from the coach. The two most controlled motives-introjected and external regulation-were both explained by high scores on task and ego involvement.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
This article was submitted to Performance Science, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology
Edited by: Rita F. De Oliveira, London South Bank University, United Kingdom
Reviewed by: Alexander T. Latinjak, University of Suffolk, United Kingdom; Marco Batista, Instituto Politécnico de Castelo Branco, Portugal
ISSN:1664-1078
1664-1078
DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.811154