Complication rates of colonoscopy in an Australian teaching hospital environment
Background: Quality assurance is an important part of health‐care delivery. With the high level of awareness relating to adverse events from medical care, demonstration of a high standard of practice in gastroenterology is desirable. Aims: To determine the incidence of significant complications or...
Saved in:
Published in: | Internal medicine journal Vol. 33; no. 8; pp. 355 - 359 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Oxford, UK
Blackwell Science Pty
01-08-2003
Blackwell Science |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Background: Quality assurance is an important part of health‐care delivery. With the high level of awareness relating to adverse events from medical care, demonstration of a high standard of practice in gastroenterology is desirable.
Aims: To determine the incidence of significant complications or death within 30 days of an outpatient colonoscopy, and confirm that these are in keeping with international standards.
Methods: A retrospective audit of linked endoscopy and other hospital databases and selected medical records was carried out, based on reports of 30 463 colonoscopies performed between 5 September 1989 and 31 December 1999 in the three Western Australian public teaching hospitals.
Results: A total of 23 508 colonoscopies was performed on an outpatient basis between 5 September 1989 and 31 December 1999. Post‐procedural complications identified (and incidence) were: bleeding episodes 49 (0.21%), colonic perforation 23 (0.1%), abdominal pain 22 (0.09%), and others 19 (0.08%). A total of 196 patients died within 30 days of undergoing colonoscopy (0.83%), although only three deaths were attributable to the procedure itself (incidence 0.01%). Two were inpatients at the time of the procedure (outpatient mortality rate 0.004%). The combined incidence of bleeding and perforation was not significantly different between consultant endoscopists and unassisted trainees (incidence 0.21% vs 0.20%, P = 0.98).
Conclusions: The incidence of bleeding and perforation is similar to other reported series and reflects procedures performed by personnel with a wide range of endoscopic experience. The incidence of complications was not greater for trainees compared with consultant endoscopists. All bleeding episodes and the majority of perforations were associated with a therapeutic intervention. Diagnostic colonoscopy in particular is a very safe procedure. (Intern Med J 2003; 33: 355−359) |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ArticleID:IMJ397 istex:41B1956221AF7FE3340146403883A72771F0004A ark:/67375/WNG-3D7SF05V-L Funding: None Conflicts of interest: None ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1444-0903 1445-5994 |
DOI: | 10.1046/j.1445-5994.2003.00397.x |