Modified olfactory training in patients with postinfectious olfactory loss

Objectives/Hypothesis Patients with olfactory dysfunction benefit from repeated exposure to odors, so‐called olfactory training (OT). This does not mean occasional smelling but the structured sniffing of a defined set of odors, twice daily, for a period of 4 months or longer. In this prospective stu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Laryngoscope Vol. 125; no. 8; pp. 1763 - 1766
Main Authors: Altundag, Aytug, Cayonu, Melih, Kayabasoglu, Gurkan, Salihoglu, Murat, Tekeli, Hakan, Saglam, Omer, Hummel, Thomas
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01-08-2015
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objectives/Hypothesis Patients with olfactory dysfunction benefit from repeated exposure to odors, so‐called olfactory training (OT). This does not mean occasional smelling but the structured sniffing of a defined set of odors, twice daily, for a period of 4 months or longer. In this prospective study, we investigated whether the effect of OT might increase through the use of more odors and extension of the training period. Study Design and Methods This study shows OT results when performed with four or 12 odors for 36 weeks in patients with postinfectious olfactory dysfunction. A total of 85 subjects participated (mean age 45.6 ± 10.5 years, range 24–68 years). Three groups were formed: 1) In the modified olfactory training (MOT) group, patients used three sets of four different odors sequentially. 2) Participants in the classical odor training (COT) group used four odors. 3) Participants in the control group did not perform OT. All groups were matched for age and sex distribution of participants. Results Both participants in the COT and MOT groups reached better scores than controls in terms of odor discrimination and odor identification. Continuing OT with four different odors after the 12th and 24th weeks produced better results in terms of odor discrimination and odor identification scores as compared to using the same four odors throughout the entire study. Conclusion This study confirmed the effectiveness of OT. Increasing the duration of OT and changing the odors enhances the success rate of this therapy. Level of Evidence 2b. Laryngoscope, 125:1763–1766, 2015
Bibliography:ArticleID:LARY25245
istex:76B2B23A4896AB615A38686CB24FDD44A0A0A4CC
ark:/67375/WNG-LZMZ99V8-J
The study was supported by funds from the various participating universities. The authors have no other funding, financial relationships, or conflicts of interest to disclose.
Parts of this article were presented as a poster at Clinical Chemosensation, Dresden, Germany, November 21–23, 2014.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0023-852X
1531-4995
DOI:10.1002/lary.25245