Early Steroid Withdrawal in Adult Kidney Transplantation at a Single Center
Abstract Background Beneficial effects of protocols using minimal steroid exposure have been recently reported. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of kidney transplantation recipients who received immunosuppression protocols with early steroid withdrawal (ESW) at our center. Meth...
Saved in:
Published in: | Transplantation proceedings Vol. 44; no. 1; pp. 179 - 181 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article Conference Proceeding |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Amsterdam
Elsevier Inc
2012
Elsevier |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Abstract Background Beneficial effects of protocols using minimal steroid exposure have been recently reported. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of kidney transplantation recipients who received immunosuppression protocols with early steroid withdrawal (ESW) at our center. Methods We retrospectively studied 84 kidney transplant recipients who had received ESW immunosuppressive protocols at our center from March 2005 to December 2010. The immunosuppressive regimen was a combination of calcineurin inhibitors (tacrolimus/cyclosporine), methylprednisolone, which was tapered and discontinued within 2 months, mycophenolate mofetil, and basiliximab (postoperative days 0 and 4). We compared the outcomes of our ESW recipients with those of a historical control group (February 2003 to January 2005; n = 18). Results Clinical acute rejection episodes were observed in 15 (17.9%) and 5 (27.8%) cases in the ESW and control groups, respectively. Cytomegalovirus infection occurred in 12 (14.3%) and 5 (27.8%) cases in the ESW and control groups, respectively. The creatinine levels at 1 year after transplantation were 1.3 ± 0.4 mg/dL and 1.3 ± 0.5 mg/dL in the ESW and control groups, respectively. In the ESW group of 84 recipients, actuarial patient survival at 1 year was 94.0%. In the historical group of 18 recipients, the actuarial patient survival at 1 year was 100% ( P = .76). In the ESW group the graft survival rate at 1 year was 95.2%. In the historical group, graft survival rate at 1 year was 100% ( P = .65). There were no significant differences in the parameters between the groups. Conclusions The outcomes from this study were considered to be acceptable; however, the possibility of improving the protocols exists. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0041-1345 1873-2623 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.transproceed.2011.12.068 |