Cognitive flexibility, heart rate variability, and resilience predict fine-grained regulation of arousal during prolonged threat

Emotion regulation in the ongoing presence of a threat is essential for adaptive behavior. Threatening situations change over time and, as a consequence, require a fine‐tuned, dynamic regulation of arousal to match the current state of the environment. Constructs such as cognitive flexibility, heart...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Psychophysiology Vol. 53; no. 6; pp. 880 - 890
Main Authors: Hildebrandt, Lea K., McCall, Cade, Engen, Haakon G., Singer, Tania
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01-06-2016
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Emotion regulation in the ongoing presence of a threat is essential for adaptive behavior. Threatening situations change over time and, as a consequence, require a fine‐tuned, dynamic regulation of arousal to match the current state of the environment. Constructs such as cognitive flexibility, heart rate variability, and resilience have been proposed as resources for adaptive emotion regulation, especially in a moment‐to‐moment fashion. Nevertheless, none of these constructs has been empirically related to the dynamic regulation of arousal as it unfolds over the course of a prolonged threatening episode. Here, we do so by placing participants in a threatening and evolving immersive virtual environment called Room 101, while recording their skin conductance. Subsequently, participants rated their subjective arousal continuously over the course of the experience. Participants who had shown greater cognitive flexibility in a separate task (i.e., fewer task‐switching costs when switching to evaluating the valence of positive stimuli) showed better regulation of physiological arousal (skin conductance level), during less‐threatening phases of Room 101. Individuals with higher trait resilience and individuals with higher resting heart rate variability showed more regulation in terms of their subjective arousal experience. The results indicate that emotional, cognitive, and physiological flexibility support nuanced adaptive regulation of objective and experienced arousal in the ongoing presence of threats. Furthermore, the results indicate that these forms of flexibility differentially affect automatic and objective versus reflective and subjective processes.
Bibliography:istex:EC154CC4FE9477DBE8B4BF2106C0844E9E042B5A
Max Planck Society
ArticleID:PSYP12632
ark:/67375/WNG-ZPT20KLV-0
European Community's Seventh Framework Program (FP7/2007-2013)/ERC - No. 205557
This work was supported by the Max Planck Society and a grant to TS from the European Research Council under the European Community's Seventh Framework Program (FP7/2007‐2013)/ERC Grant agreement No. 205557 [EMPATHICBRAIN].
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0048-5772
1469-8986
1540-5958
DOI:10.1111/psyp.12632