Creating a Network of High-Quality Skilled Nursing Facilities: Preliminary Data on the Postacute Care Quality Improvement Experiences of an Accountable Care Organization

• Published in: Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS) Vol. 63; no. 4; pp. 804 - 808
• Main Authors: Lage, Daniel E., Rusinak, Donna, Carr, Darcy, Grabowski, David C., Ackerly, D. Clay
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01-04-2015
• Subjects: Accountable Care Organizations; Community Networks - organization & administration; Medicare; postacute care; Quality of Health Care; Risk Assessment; skilled nursing facilities; Skilled Nursing Facilities - organization & administration; Skilled Nursing Facilities - standards; United States; United States; United States > US; postacute care; accountable care organizations; skilled nursing facilities
• ISSN: 0002-8614; 1532-5415
• DOI: 10.1111/jgs.13351

Postacute care (PAC) is an important source of cost growth and variation in the Medicare program and is critical to accountable care organization (ACO) and bundled payment efforts to improve quality and value in the Medicare program, but ACOs must often look outside their walls to identify high‐value external PAC partners, including skilled nursing facilities (SNFs). As a solution to this problem, the integrated health system, Partners HealthCare System (PHS) and its Pioneer ACO launched the PHS SNF Collaborative Network in October 2013 to identify and partner with high‐quality SNFs. This study details the method by which PHS selected SNFs using minimum criteria based on public scores and secondary criteria based on self‐reported measures, describes the characteristics of selected and nonselected SNFs, and reports SNF satisfaction with the collaborative. The selected SNFs (n = 47) had significantly higher CMS Five‐Star scores than the nonselected SNFs (n = 93) (4.6 vs 3.2, P < .001) and were more likely than nonselected SNFs that met the minimum criteria (n = 35) to have more than 5 days of clinical coverage (17.0% vs 2.9%, P = .02) and to have a physician see admitted individuals within 24 (38.3% vs 17.1%, P = .02) and 48 hours (93.6% vs 80.0%, P = .03). A survey sent to collaborative SNFs found high satisfaction with the process (average satisfaction, 4.6/5, with 1 = very dissatisfied and 5 = very satisfied, n = 19). Although the challenges of improving care in SNFs remain daunting, this approach can serve as a first step toward greater clinical collaboration between acute and postacute settings that will lead to better outcomes for frail older adults.