Treatment patterns of in-patient spasticity medication use after traumatic spinal cord injury: a prospective cohort study

Study Design Prospective cohort study using the Rick Hansen SCI Registry (RHSCIR) and retrospective medical chart review. Objective To describe treatment patterns of in-patient anti-spasticity medication use following traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) in acute and rehabilitation hospital settings i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Spinal cord Vol. 56; no. 12; pp. 1176 - 1183
Main Authors: Holtz, Kaila A., Szefer, Elena, Noonan, Vanessa K, Kwon, Brian K., Mills, Patricia B.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: London Nature Publishing Group UK 01-12-2018
Nature Publishing Group
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Study Design Prospective cohort study using the Rick Hansen SCI Registry (RHSCIR) and retrospective medical chart review. Objective To describe treatment patterns of in-patient anti-spasticity medication use following traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) in acute and rehabilitation hospital settings in British Columbia, Canada. Setting Quaternary trauma center, rehabilitation center. Methods Individuals with traumatic SCI between 2005 and 2014 enrolled in the Vancouver RHSCIR site ( N  = 917) were eligible for inclusion. Oral and injectable anti-spasticity medication use were the main outcome measures. Results In 769 participants, higher neurological level and injury severity were associated with in-patient anti-spasticity medication use ( p  < 0.001 for both). Of individuals with cervical and thoracic injuries ( n  = 589), 37% were prescribed anti-spasticity medication during hospital admission. Baclofen was the most commonly used first line oral therapy. Mean (SD) and median time from injury to Baclofen initiation was 70 (69) and 50 days, respectively. The probability of having initiated an in-patient anti-spasticity medication was 55% (95% CI (49, 60)) for individuals 6 months post-injury, and 71% (95% CI (62, 79)) for individuals 12 months post-injury. At community discharge, the prevalence of oral and injectable anti-spasticity medication use was 26 and 5%. Practice patterns of anti-spasticity medication use (2005–2009 vs. 2010–2014) have not changed significantly over time. Conclusions This is the first large prospective cohort study of in-patient anti-spasticity medication use following traumatic SCI. Results from our study inform clinicians and individuals of “real world” anti-spasticity medication use among individuals with traumatic SCI and may help guide care for this population in the community.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1362-4393
1476-5624
DOI:10.1038/s41393-018-0165-0