Laboratory comparison of the crumb-rubber and SBS modified bitumen and hot mix asphalt

► We investigate the performance of crumb rubber (CR) and SBS modified mixtures. ► Both SBS and CR modified bitumens exhibit reduced temperature susceptibility. ► Differences occur in the modification indices above 4% SBS content and 9% CR content. ► Two times higher CR content than SBS in mixtures...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Construction & building materials Vol. 25; no. 8; pp. 3204 - 3212
Main Authors: Kok, Baha Vural, Colak, Hakan
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier Ltd 01-08-2011
Elsevier B.V
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:► We investigate the performance of crumb rubber (CR) and SBS modified mixtures. ► Both SBS and CR modified bitumens exhibit reduced temperature susceptibility. ► Differences occur in the modification indices above 4% SBS content and 9% CR content. ► Two times higher CR content than SBS in mixtures provides the same creep stiffness value >8% CR modification yields a load cycle number five times that of the base mixture. The use of crumb rubber (CR) recycled from waste tires using an ambient grinding process was evaluated at two stages in asphalt formulation. First, bitumen modified with crumb rubber was evaluated by rotational viscometery (RV), dynamic shear rheometry (DSR) and conventional binder tests. Hot asphalt mixtures including crumb-rubber-modified bitumen were then evaluated by determining the permanent and fatigue characteristics and stiffness moduli of control and modified mixtures. The properties of the crumb-rubber-modified bitumen and asphalt mixtures were compared to different contents of styrene–butadiene–styrene (SBS) modified-bitumen and asphalt mixtures. The tests showed that to achieve the same performance, as with SBS-modification, the CR-content must be used at much higher than SBS. 8%-CR modification was determined as the most suitable content according to both binder and mixture tests.
ISSN:0950-0618
1879-0526
DOI:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.03.005