Population‐based programs for increasing colorectal cancer screening in the United States

• Published in: CA: a cancer journal for clinicians Vol. 65; no. 6; pp. 496 - 510
• Main Authors: Verma, Manisha, Sarfaty, Mona, Brooks, Durado, Wender, Richard C.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01-11-2015
• Subjects: Colonoscopy; Colorectal cancer; colorectal cancer screening; Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis; Colorectal Neoplasms - prevention & control; Early Detection of Cancer - methods; Humans; Intervention; mass screening; Mass Screening - methods; Medical screening; organized screening program; population management; prevention program; Preventive Health Services; United States; United States; United States > US; organized screening program; prevention program; colorectal cancer screening; mass screening; population management
• ISSN: 0007-9235; 1542-4863
• DOI: 10.3322/caac.21295

Answer questions and earn CME/CNE
Screening to detect polyps or cancer at an early stage has been shown to produce better outcomes in colorectal cancer (CRC). Programs with a population‐based approach can reach a large majority of the eligible population and can offer cost‐effective interventions with the potential benefit of maximizing early cancer detection and prevention using a complete follow‐up plan. The purpose of this review was to summarize the key features of population‐based programs to increase CRC screening in the United States. A search was conducted in the SCOPUS, OvidSP, and PubMed databases. The authors selected published reports of population‐based programs that met at least 5 of the 6 International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) criteria for cancer prevention and were known to the National Colorectal Cancer Roundtable. Interventions at the level of individual practices were not included in this review. IARC cancer prevention criteria served as a framework to assess the effective processes and elements of a population‐based program. Eight programs were included in this review. Half of the programs met all IARC criteria, and all programs led to improvements in screening rates. The rate of colonoscopy after a positive stool test was heterogeneous among programs. Different population‐based strategies were used to promote these screening programs, including system‐based, provider‐based, patient‐based, and media‐based strategies. Treatment of identified cancer cases was not included explicitly in 4 programs but was offered through routine medical care. Evidence‐based methods for promoting CRC screening at a population level can guide the development of future approaches in health care prevention. The key elements of a successful population‐based approach include adherence to the 6 IARC criteria and 4 additional elements (an identified external funding source, a structured policy for positive fecal occult blood test results and confirmed cancer cases, outreach activities for recruitment and patient education, and an established rescreening process). CA Cancer J Clin 2015. © 2015 American Cancer Society. CA Cancer J Clin 2015;65:496–510. © 2015 American Cancer Society.