Histologic and clinical follow‐up of thyroid fine‐needle aspirates in pediatric patients

BACKGROUND Although fine‐needle aspiration (FNA) has an important role in evaluating thyroid nodules in adults, there is little published information regarding its utility in the pediatric population. METHODS A retrospective analysis of thyroid FNAs for patients who were 18 years old or younger at 2...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Cancer cytopathology Vol. 124; no. 7; pp. 467 - 471
Main Authors: Partyka, Kristen L., Huang, Eric C., Cramer, Harvey M., Chen, Shaoxiong, Wu, Howard H.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01-07-2016
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:BACKGROUND Although fine‐needle aspiration (FNA) has an important role in evaluating thyroid nodules in adults, there is little published information regarding its utility in the pediatric population. METHODS A retrospective analysis of thyroid FNAs for patients who were 18 years old or younger at 2 institutions was conducted. Aspirates were retrospectively categorized with the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology. These diagnoses were then correlated with either final histopathology or clinical follow‐up. RESULTS A total of 186 thyroid FNA samples from 154 patients (122 females and 32 males), who ranged in age from 9 months to 18 years (median, 16 years; mean, 14 years), were identified. FNA was performed to evaluate 1 to 3 nodules for each patient. Aspirates were classified as follows: nondiagnostic (n = 27), benign (n = 114), atypia of undetermined significance (AUS; n = 21), follicular neoplasm (FN; n = 8), suspicious for malignancy (n = 3), and malignant (n = 13). Sixty‐one samples had a histologic correlation, 68 were followed clinically for ≥2 years, and 57 either had no follow‐up or were followed for <2 years. For statistical purposes, FNA diagnoses of suspicious and malignant were considered positive, and benign lesions were considered negative. The accuracy was 99%, and the sensitivity and specificity were 94% and 100%, respectively. The risk of malignancy, not including papillary microcarcinoma, was 2% for benign aspirates, 21% for AUS, 57% for FN, and 100% for suspicious or malignant aspirates. CONCLUSIONS This analysis demonstrates that FNA is a sensitive and highly specific modality for evaluating thyroid nodules in pediatric patients. Each diagnostic category can facilitate communication and guide appropriate management. Cancer Cytopathol 2016;124:467–71. © 2016 American Cancer Society. With thyroid fine‐needle aspiration, the risk of malignancy, not including papillary microcarcinoma, for the pediatric population (≤18 years old) is 2% for benign aspirates, 21% for atypia of undetermined significance, 57% for follicular neoplasm, and 100% for suspicious or malignant aspirates.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1934-662X
1934-6638
DOI:10.1002/cncy.21713