The Mediating Role of Psychological Need Thwarting in the Relationship Between Compulsory Citizenship Behavior and Psychological Withdrawal

This study examined a novel process underlying the relationship between compulsory citizenship behavior and psychological withdrawal. Specifically, based on basic psychological needs theory, thwarting of autonomy and relatedness needs were expected to explain the association between compulsory citiz...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Frontiers in psychology Vol. 10; p. 2595
Main Authors: Bashir, Mohsin, Shaheen, Kanwal, Saleem, Sharjeel, Bhutta, Mohammed Khurrum, Abrar, Muhammad, Jun, Zhao
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 26-11-2019
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This study examined a novel process underlying the relationship between compulsory citizenship behavior and psychological withdrawal. Specifically, based on basic psychological needs theory, thwarting of autonomy and relatedness needs were expected to explain the association between compulsory citizenship behavior and psychological withdrawal. The PROCESS macro was used to analyze the data collected from 368 clerical staff working in public universities in Pakistan. The results confirmed that thwarting of autonomy and relatedness need mediated the relationship between compulsory citizenship behavior and psychological withdrawal. This study makes a significant contribution to the unexplored domain of the process employees use to cope with compulsory citizenship behavior. It also highlights the role of an understudied construct, i.e., psychological need thwarting as a crucial motivational mechanism for elucidating the relationship between compulsory citizenship behavior and psychological withdrawal. The findings of this study provide recommendations for future researchers, along with its implications for practitioners.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Edited by: Jon Gruda, Maynooth University, Ireland
This article was submitted to Organizational Psychology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology
These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship
Reviewed by: Jim Allen McCleskey, Western Governors University, United States; María del Mar Molero, University of Almería, Spain
ISSN:1664-1078
1664-1078
DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02595