Folk beliefs about genetic variation predict avoidance of biracial individuals

People give widely varying estimates for the amount of genetic overlap that exists between humans. While some laypeople believe that humans are highly genetically similar to one another, others believe that humans share very little genetic overlap. These studies examine how beliefs about genetic ove...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Frontiers in psychology Vol. 6; p. 357
Main Authors: Kang, Sonia K, Plaks, Jason E, Remedios, Jessica D
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 07-04-2015
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:People give widely varying estimates for the amount of genetic overlap that exists between humans. While some laypeople believe that humans are highly genetically similar to one another, others believe that humans share very little genetic overlap. These studies examine how beliefs about genetic overlap affect neural and evaluative reactions to racially-ambiguous and biracial targets. In Study 1, we found that lower genetic overlap estimates predicted a stronger neural avoidance response to biracial compared to monoracial targets. In Study 2, we found that lower genetic overlap estimates predicted longer response times to classify biracial (vs. monoracial) faces into racial categories. In Study 3, we manipulated genetic overlap beliefs and found that participants in the low overlap condition explicitly rated biracial targets more negatively than those in the high overlap condition. Taken together, these data suggest that genetic overlap beliefs influence perceivers' processing fluency and evaluation of biracial and racially-ambiguous individuals.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
This article was submitted to Personality and Social Psychology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology
Edited by: Marcel Zentner, University of Innsbruck, Austria
Reviewed by: Mark Hallahan, College of the Holy Cross, USA; Kenneth G. DeMarree, University at Buffalo, USA; Susan K. Fenstermacher, University of Vermont, USA
ISSN:1664-1078
1664-1078
DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00357