Foreign direct investment along the Belt and Road: A political economy perspective

• Published in: Journal of international business studies Vol. 53; no. 5; pp. 902 - 919
• Main Authors: Li, Jiatao, Van Assche, Ari, Li, Lee, Qian, Gongming
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London Palgrave Macmillan UK 01-07-2022; Palgrave Macmillan
• Subjects: Ambition; Bargaining; Business and Management; Business Strategy/Leadership; Capitalism; Companies; Foreign investment; Geopolitics; Host country; Infrastructure; International Business; Legitimacy; Management; Organization; Perspective; Political economy; Roads & highways; China; institutions; bargaining; China; jockeying strategies; geopolitics; FDI; Belt and Road Initiative
• ISSN: 0047-2506; 1478-6990
• DOI: 10.1057/s41267-021-00435-0

In 2013, China launched its ambitious Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), a large portfolio of infrastructure projects across 71 countries intended to link Eurasian markets by rail and sea. The state-led nature of the Initiative combined with its transformative geopolitical implications have conditioned the type of engagement that many governments and firms in host and third countries are willing to take in Chinese-funded BRI projects. Building on two theoretical streams that have originated in international political economy but have received growing attention in international business, varieties of capitalism and geopolitics, this perspective shows how a greater understanding of the institutional and geopolitical context surrounding BRI helps decipher the selection of host-country firms and third-country MNEs in Chinese-funded BRI projects. We portray firm selection in a BRI project as the outcome of a one-tier bargaining game between China and a host country. We show how institutions and geopolitics influence both the legitimacy gap of Chinese SOEs in a host country and the host country’s relative bargaining power, affecting the likelihood that host firms and third-country MNEs are selected in BRI projects. We also discuss the geopolitical jockeying strategies that these firms can adopt to influence the outcome of the bargaining game.