The Influence of Social Comparison and Peer Group Size on Risky Decision-Making

This study explores the influence of different social reference points and different comparison group sizes on risky decision-making. Participants were presented with a scenario describing an exam, and presented with the opportunity of making a risky decision in the context of different information...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Frontiers in psychology Vol. 7; p. 1232
Main Authors: Wang, Dawei, Zhu, Liping, Maguire, Phil, Liu, Yixin, Pang, Kaiyuan, Li, Zhenying, Hu, Yixin
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 17-08-2016
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This study explores the influence of different social reference points and different comparison group sizes on risky decision-making. Participants were presented with a scenario describing an exam, and presented with the opportunity of making a risky decision in the context of different information provided about the performance of their peers. We found that behavior was influenced, not only by comparison with peers, but also by the size of the comparison group. Specifically, the larger the reference group, the more polarized the behavior it prompted. In situations describing social loss, participants were led to make riskier decisions after comparing themselves against larger groups, while in situations describing social gain, they become more risk averse. These results indicate that decision making is influenced both by social comparison and the number of people making up the social reference group.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
This article was submitted to Cognitive Science, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology
Edited by: Rick Thomas, Georgia Institute of Technology, USA
Reviewed by: Ana M. Franco-Watkins, Auburn University, USA; John Raacke, Fort Hays State University, USA
ISSN:1664-1078
1664-1078
DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01232