Predicting subsequent task performance from goal motivation and goal failure

Recent research has demonstrated that the cognitive processes associated with goal pursuit can continue to interfere with unrelated tasks when a goal is unfulfilled. Drawing from the self-regulation and goal-striving literatures, the present study explored the impact of goal failure on subsequent co...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Frontiers in psychology Vol. 6; p. 926
Main Authors: Healy, Laura C, Ntoumanis, Nikos, Stewart, Brandon D, Duda, Joan L
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 02-07-2015
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Recent research has demonstrated that the cognitive processes associated with goal pursuit can continue to interfere with unrelated tasks when a goal is unfulfilled. Drawing from the self-regulation and goal-striving literatures, the present study explored the impact of goal failure on subsequent cognitive and physical task performance. Furthermore, we examined if the autonomous or controlled motivation underpinning goal striving moderates the responses to goal failure. Athletes (75 male, 59 female, Mage = 19.90 years, SDage = 3.50) completed a cycling trial with the goal of covering a given distance in 8 min. Prior to the trial, their motivation was primed using a video. During the trial they were provided with manipulated performance feedback, thus creating conditions of goal success or failure. No differences emerged in the responses to goal failure between the primed motivation or performance feedback conditions. We make recommendations for future research into how individuals can deal with failure in goal striving.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
This article was submitted to Movement Science and Sport Psychology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology
Edited by: Deborah L. Feltz, Michigan State University, USA
Reviewed by: Jeannine Ohlert, German Sport University Cologne, Germany; Samuel Forlenza, Shippensburg University, USA
ISSN:1664-1078
1664-1078
DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00926