Exercise-induced desaturation in subjects with non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis: laboratory-based tests versus field-based exercise tests

To investigate the validity of field walking tests to identify exercise-induced hypoxemia and to compare cardiorespiratory responses and perceived effort between laboratory-based and field-based exercise tests in subjects with bronchiectasis. This was a cross-sectional study involving 72 non-oxygen-...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia Vol. 47; no. 2; p. e20200134
Main Authors: Oliveira, Cristiane Helga Yamane de, José, Anderson, Camargo, Anderson Alves de, Feltrim, Maria Ignez Zanetti, Athanazio, Rodrigo Abensur, Rached, Samia Zahi, Stelmalch, Rafael, Corso, Simone Dal
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Brazil Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia 01-01-2021
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:To investigate the validity of field walking tests to identify exercise-induced hypoxemia and to compare cardiorespiratory responses and perceived effort between laboratory-based and field-based exercise tests in subjects with bronchiectasis. This was a cross-sectional study involving 72 non-oxygen-dependent participants (28 men; mean age = 48.3 ± 14.5 years; and mean FEV1 = 54.1 ± 23.4% of the predicted value). The participants underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) on a treadmill and constant work-rate exercise testing (CWRET) on the same day (1 h apart). In another visit, they underwent incremental shuttle walk testing (ISWT) and endurance shuttle walk testing (ESWT; 1 h apart). Desaturation was defined as a reduction in SpO2 ≥ 4% from rest to peak exercise. CPET results were compared with ISWT results, as were CWRET results with ESWT results. There was no difference in the magnitude of desaturation between CPET and ISWT (-7.7 ± 6.3% vs. -6.6 ± 5.6%; p = 0.10) and between CWRET and ESWT (-6.8 ± 5.8% vs. -7.2 ± 6.3%; p = 0.50). The incremental tests showed an agreement in the magnitude of desaturation in the desaturation and no desaturation groups (42 and 14 participants, respectively; p < 0.01), as did the endurance tests (39 and 16 participants; p < 0.01). The magnitude of desaturation was similar among the participants who did or did not reach at least 85% of the maximum predicted HR. Field exercise tests showed good precision to detect desaturation. Field tests might be an alternative to laboratory tests when the clinical question is to investigate exercise-induced desaturation in subjects with bronchiectasis.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS: CHYO: conception and design of the study; data acquisition, analysis, and interpretation; drafting of the manuscript; and final approval of the version to be published. AJ: data analysis and interpretation; critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content; drafting of the manuscript; and final approval of the version to be published. AAC: conception and design of the study; data analysis; critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content; and final approval of the version to be published. MIZF: data analysis; critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content; and final approval of the version to be published. RAA and SZR: data analysis and interpretation; critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content; and final approval of the version to be published. RS: conception and design of the study; data analysis and interpretation; critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content; and final approval of the version to be published. SDC: conception and design of the study; data analysis and interpretation; drafting of the manuscript; critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content; and final approval of the version to be published.
ISSN:1806-3756
1806-3713
1806-3756
DOI:10.36416/1806-3756/e20200134