Validity and reliability of “My Jump app” to assess vertical jump performance: a meta-analytic review

• Published in: Scientific reports Vol. 13; no. 1; p. 20137
• Main Authors: Gençoğlu, Cebrail, Ulupınar, Süleyman, Özbay, Serhat, Turan, Murat, Savaş, Buğra Çağatay, Asan, Selim, İnce, İzzet
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London Nature Publishing Group UK 17-11-2023; Nature Publishing Group; Nature Portfolio
• Subjects: 631/114; 692/700/478; Correlation coefficient; Flight; Heterogeneity; Humanities and Social Sciences; Jumping; Meta-analysis; multidisciplinary; Science; Science (multidisciplinary); Validity
• ISSN: 2045-2322; 2045-2322
• DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-46935-x

This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to investigate the validity and reliability of the My Jump smartphone application in measuring vertical jump height, specifically using flight-time-based measures. To identify potential studies for inclusion, a comprehensive search strategy was employed in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and EBSCO host databases. Validity was assessed in two ways: (1) mean and standard deviations of My Jump measurements were compared to criterion methods to assess the agreement of raw scores; (2) correlation coefficients evaluated the within-group consistency of rankings between My Jump and criterion methods. Reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Heterogeneity was evaluated via Cochrane’s Q statistic, its p-value, I
2
value, and tau
2
value. Publication bias was explored through funnel plot symmetry and confirmed with extended Egger’s test. Following the search, 21 studies met the inclusion criteria. Results showed no significant difference in raw scores between My Jump and criterion methods, indicating high agreement. High correlation was also found for within-group rankings, suggesting consistency. The My Jump application demonstrated nearly perfect reliability scores. The My Jump application appears to be a valid and reliable tool for sports scientists and strength and conditioning practitioners, offering a cost-effective and accessible means for accurately assessing vertical jump performance in various settings. However, it should be noted that these results are specific to flight-time-based measures, and further research is needed to validate these findings against gold-standard take-off velocity methods.