Biomarkers of Osteosarcoma, Chondrosarcoma, and Ewing Sarcoma

Osteosarcoma is the most frequent malignant bone neoplasm, followed by chondrosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma. The diagnosis of bone neoplasms is generally made through histological evaluation of a biopsy. Clinical and radiological features are also important in aiding diagnosis and to complete the stagin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Frontiers in pharmacology Vol. 8; p. 150
Main Authors: Evola, Francesco R, Costarella, Luciano, Pavone, Vito, Caff, Giuseppe, Cannavò, Luca, Sessa, Andrea, Avondo, Sergio, Sessa, Giuseppe
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 07-04-2017
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Osteosarcoma is the most frequent malignant bone neoplasm, followed by chondrosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma. The diagnosis of bone neoplasms is generally made through histological evaluation of a biopsy. Clinical and radiological features are also important in aiding diagnosis and to complete the staging of bone cancer. In addition to these, there are several non-specific serological or specific molecular markers for bone neoplasms. In bone tumors, molecular markers increase the accuracy of the diagnosis and assist in subtyping bone tumors. Here, we review these markers and discuss their role in the diagnosis and prognosis of the three most frequent malignant bone neoplasms, namely osteosarcoma, chondrosarcoma, and Ewing sarcoma.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
Edited by: Giovanni Li Volti, University of Catania, Italy
Reviewed by: Vincenzo Bramanti, Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti Villa Sofia Cervello, Italy; Francesco Cappello, University of Palermo, Italy
This article was submitted to Experimental Pharmacology and Drug Discovery, a section of the journal Frontiers in Pharmacology
ISSN:1663-9812
1663-9812
DOI:10.3389/fphar.2017.00150