The Motivational Hierarchy between the Personal Self and Close Others in the Chinese Brain: an ERP Study

People base their decisions not only on their own self-interest but also on the interests of close others. Generally, the personal self has primacy in the motivational hierarchy in the Western culture. A recent study found that friends have the same motivational hierarchy as the personal self in the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Frontiers in psychology Vol. 7; p. 1467
Main Authors: Zhu, Xiangru, Wang, Lili, Yang, Suyong, Gu, Ruolei, Wu, Haiyan, Luo, Yuejia
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 27-09-2016
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:People base their decisions not only on their own self-interest but also on the interests of close others. Generally, the personal self has primacy in the motivational hierarchy in the Western culture. A recent study found that friends have the same motivational hierarchy as the personal self in the Eastern collectivist culture. Remaining unknown is whether the motivational hierarchy of the personal self and close others can be manifested in the collectivist brain. In the present study, we asked participants to gamble for the personal self, close others (i.e., mother, father, and close friend), and strangers. The positive-going deflection of event-related potentials (ERPs) in response to positive feedback showed the following pattern: personal self = mother = father > friend > stranger. In the loss condition, no significant beneficiary effect was observed. The present results indicate that the personal self and parents are intertwined in the motivational system in the Chinese undergraduate student brain, supporting the view that the personal self and parents have the same motivational primacy at the electrocortical level.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Reviewed by: Jessica Dere, University of Toronto Scarborough, Canada; Sawa Senzaki, University of Wisconsin–Green Bay, USA
This article was submitted to Cultural Psychology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology
Edited by: Yulia Chentsova Dutton, Georgetown University, USA
ISSN:1664-1078
1664-1078
DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01467