A Comparative Assessment of MR BI-RADS 4 Breast Lesions With Kaiser Score and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Value

To investigate the diagnostic performance of the Kaiser score and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) to differentiate Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) Category 4 lesions at dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI. This was a single-institution retrospective study of patients who unde...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Frontiers in oncology Vol. 11; p. 779642
Main Authors: Meng, Lingsong, Zhao, Xin, Lu, Lin, Xing, Qingna, Wang, Kaiyu, Guo, Yafei, Shang, Honglei, Chen, Yan, Huang, Mengyue, Sun, Yongbing, Zhang, Xiaoan
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 02-12-2021
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:To investigate the diagnostic performance of the Kaiser score and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) to differentiate Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) Category 4 lesions at dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI. This was a single-institution retrospective study of patients who underwent breast MRI from March 2020 to June 2021. All image data were acquired with a 3-T MRI system. Kaiser score of each lesion was assigned by an experienced breast radiologist. Kaiser score+ was determined by combining ADC and Kaiser score. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of Kaiser score+, Kaiser score, and ADC. The area under the curve (AUC) values were calculated and compared by using the Delong test. The differences in sensitivity and specificity between different indicators were determined by the McNemar test. The study involved 243 women (mean age, 43.1 years; age range, 18-67 years) with 268 MR BI-RADS 4 lesions. Overall diagnostic performance for Kaiser score (AUC, 0.902) was significantly higher than for ADC (AUC, 0.81; = 0.004). There were no significant differences in AUCs between Kaiser score and Kaiser score+ ( = 0.134). The Kaiser score was superior to ADC in avoiding unnecessary biopsies ( < 0.001). Compared with the Kaiser score alone, the specificity of Kaiser score+ increased by 7.82%, however, at the price of a lower sensitivity. For MR BI-RADS category 4 breast lesions, the Kaiser score was superior to ADC mapping regarding the potential to avoid unnecessary biopsies. However, the combination of both indicators did not significantly contribute to breast cancer diagnosis of this subgroup.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
These authors have contributed equally to this work
This article was submitted to Breast Cancer, a section of the journal Frontiers in Oncology
Edited by: Katja Pinker-Domenig, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States
Reviewed by: Pascal Baltzer, Medical University of Vienna, Austria; Matthias Dietzel, University Hospital Erlangen, Germany
ISSN:2234-943X
2234-943X
DOI:10.3389/fonc.2021.779642