Cochlear Implantation in Cases of Asymmetric Hearing Loss: Subjective Benefit, Word Recognition, and Spatial Hearing

• Published in: Trends in hearing Vol. 24; p. 2331216520945524
• Main Authors: Dillon, Margaret T., Buss, Emily, Rooth, Meredith A., King, English R., McCarthy, Sarah A., Bucker, Andrea L., Deres, Ellen J., Richter, Margaret E., Thompson, Nicholas J., Canfarotta, Michael W., O’Connell, Brendan P., Pillsbury, Harold C., Brown, Kevin D.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Los Angeles, CA SAGE Publications 2020; Sage Publications Ltd
• Subjects: Adult; Cochlear Implantation; Cochlear Implants; Hearing Aids; Hearing loss; Hearing Loss - diagnosis; Hearing Loss - therapy; Humans; Prospective Studies; Sound Localization; Speech Perception; Treatment Outcome; single-sided deafness; unilateral hearing loss; spatial release from masking; binaural hearing; cochlear implant; bimodal
• ISSN: 2331-2165; 2331-2165
• DOI: 10.1177/2331216520945524

A prospective clinical trial evaluated the effectiveness of cochlear implantation in adults with asymmetric hearing loss (AHL). Twenty subjects with mild-to-moderate hearing loss in the better ear and moderate-to-profound hearing loss in the poorer ear underwent cochlear implantation of the poorer hearing ear. Subjects were evaluated preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post-activation. Preoperative performance was evaluated unaided, with traditional hearing aids (HAs) or with a bone-conduction HA. Post-activation performance was evaluated with the cochlear implant (CI) alone or in combination with a contralateral HA (bimodal). Test measures included subjective benefit, word recognition, and spatial hearing (i.e., localization and masked sentence recognition). Significant subjective benefit was reported as early as the 1-month interval, indicating better performance with the CI compared with the preferred preoperative condition. Aided word recognition with the CI alone was significantly improved at the 1-month interval compared with preoperative performance with an HA and continued to improve through the 12-month interval. Subjects demonstrated early, significant improvements in the bimodal condition on the spatial hearing tasks compared with baseline preoperative performance tested unaided. The magnitude of the benefit was reduced for subjects with AHL when compared with published data on CI users with normal hearing in the contralateral ear; this finding may reflect significant differences in age at implantation and hearing sensitivity across cohorts.