Preference reversal in quantum decision theory
We consider the psychological effect of preference reversal and show that it finds a natural explanation in the frame of quantum decision theory. When people choose between lotteries with non-negative payoffs, they prefer a more certain lottery because of uncertainty aversion. But when people evalua...
Saved in:
Published in: | Frontiers in psychology Vol. 6; p. 1538 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Switzerland
Frontiers Media S.A
08-10-2015
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | We consider the psychological effect of preference reversal and show that it finds a natural explanation in the frame of quantum decision theory. When people choose between lotteries with non-negative payoffs, they prefer a more certain lottery because of uncertainty aversion. But when people evaluate lottery prices, e.g., for selling to others the right to play them, they do this more rationally, being less subject to behavioral biases. This difference can be explained by the presence of the attraction factors entering the expression of quantum probabilities. Only the existence of attraction factors can explain why, considering two lotteries with close utility factors, a decision maker prefers one of them when choosing, but evaluates higher the other one when pricing. We derive a general quantitative criterion for the preference reversal to occur that relates the utilities of the two lotteries to the attraction factors under choosing vs. pricing and test successfully its application on experiments by Tversky et al. We also show that the planning paradox can be treated as a kind of preference reversal. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 This article was submitted to Cognition, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology Reviewed by: Peter Dixon, University of Alberta, Canada; Andrei Khrennikov, Linnaeus University, Sweden These authors have contributed equally to this work. Edited by: Sandro Sozzo, University of Leicester, UK |
ISSN: | 1664-1078 1664-1078 |
DOI: | 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01538 |