The Power of Feedback Revisited: A Meta-Analysis of Educational Feedback Research

A meta-analysis (435 studies, = 994, > 61,000) of empirical research on the effects of feedback on student learning was conducted with the purpose of replicating and expanding the research (Hattie and Timperley, 2007; Hattie, 2009; Hattie and Zierer, 2019) from meta-synthesis. Overall results bas...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Frontiers in psychology Vol. 10; p. 3087
Main Authors: Wisniewski, Benedikt, Zierer, Klaus, Hattie, John
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 22-01-2020
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:A meta-analysis (435 studies, = 994, > 61,000) of empirical research on the effects of feedback on student learning was conducted with the purpose of replicating and expanding the research (Hattie and Timperley, 2007; Hattie, 2009; Hattie and Zierer, 2019) from meta-synthesis. Overall results based on a random-effects model indicate a medium effect ( = 0.48) of feedback on student learning, but the significant heterogeneity in the data shows that feedback cannot be understood as a single consistent form of treatment. A moderator analysis revealed that the impact is substantially influenced by the information content conveyed. Furthermore, feedback has higher impact on cognitive and motor skills outcomes than on motivational and behavioral outcomes. We discuss these findings in the light of the assumptions made in (Hattie and Timperley, 2007). In general, the results suggest that feedback has rightly become a focus of teaching research and practice. However, they also point toward the necessity of interpreting different forms of feedback as independent measures.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
This article was submitted to Educational Psychology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology
Edited by: Sung-il Kim, Korea University, South Korea
Reviewed by: Frans Prins, Utrecht University, Netherlands; Lu Wang, Ball State University, United States; Roger C. Ho, National University of Singapore, Singapore
ISSN:1664-1078
1664-1078
DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03087