The Power of Feedback Revisited: A Meta-Analysis of Educational Feedback Research
A meta-analysis (435 studies, = 994, > 61,000) of empirical research on the effects of feedback on student learning was conducted with the purpose of replicating and expanding the research (Hattie and Timperley, 2007; Hattie, 2009; Hattie and Zierer, 2019) from meta-synthesis. Overall results bas...
Saved in:
Published in: | Frontiers in psychology Vol. 10; p. 3087 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Switzerland
Frontiers Media S.A
22-01-2020
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | A meta-analysis (435 studies,
= 994,
> 61,000) of empirical research on the effects of feedback on student learning was conducted with the purpose of replicating and expanding the
research (Hattie and Timperley, 2007; Hattie, 2009; Hattie and Zierer, 2019) from meta-synthesis. Overall results based on a random-effects model indicate a medium effect (
= 0.48) of feedback on student learning, but the significant heterogeneity in the data shows that feedback cannot be understood as a single consistent form of treatment. A moderator analysis revealed that the impact is substantially influenced by the information content conveyed. Furthermore, feedback has higher impact on cognitive and motor skills outcomes than on motivational and behavioral outcomes. We discuss these findings in the light of the assumptions made in
(Hattie and Timperley, 2007). In general, the results suggest that feedback has rightly become a focus of teaching research and practice. However, they also point toward the necessity of interpreting different forms of feedback as independent measures. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 ObjectType-Review-3 content type line 23 This article was submitted to Educational Psychology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology Edited by: Sung-il Kim, Korea University, South Korea Reviewed by: Frans Prins, Utrecht University, Netherlands; Lu Wang, Ball State University, United States; Roger C. Ho, National University of Singapore, Singapore |
ISSN: | 1664-1078 1664-1078 |
DOI: | 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03087 |