Effects of dietary fat profile on gut permeability and microbiota and their relationships with metabolic changes in mice
Objective To distinguish the effects of dietary fat profile on gut parameters and their relationships with metabolic changes and to determine the capacity of n‐3 fatty acids to modify gut variables in the context of diet‐induced metabolic dysfunctions. Methods Mice received control or high‐fat diets...
Saved in:
Published in: | Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.) Vol. 23; no. 7; pp. 1429 - 1439 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
United States
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01-07-2015
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Objective
To distinguish the effects of dietary fat profile on gut parameters and their relationships with metabolic changes and to determine the capacity of n‐3 fatty acids to modify gut variables in the context of diet‐induced metabolic dysfunctions.
Methods
Mice received control or high‐fat diets emphasizing saturated (HFD‐sat), n‐6 (HFD‐n6), or n‐3 (HFD‐n3) fatty acids for 8 weeks. In another cohort, mice that were maintained on HFD‐sat received n‐3‐rich fish oil or resolvin D1 supplementation.
Results
HFD‐sat and HFD‐n6 induced similar weight gain, but only HFD‐sat increased index of insulin resistance (HOMA‐IR), colonic permeability, and mesenteric fat inflammation. Hydrogen sulfide‐producing bacteria were one of the major groups driving the diet‐specific changes in gut microbiome, with the overall microbial profile being associated with changes in body weight, HOMA‐IR, and gut permeability. In mice maintained on HFD‐sat, fish oil and resolvin D1 restored barrier function and reduced inflammation in the colon but were unable to normalize HOMA‐IR.
Conclusions
Different dietary fat profiles led to distinct intestinal and metabolic outcomes that are independent of obesity. Interventions targeting inflammation successfully restored gut health but did not reverse systemic aspects of diet‐induced metabolic dysfunction, implicating separation between gut dysfunctions and disease‐initiating and/or ‐maintaining processes. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | This study was supported by a Project Grant (#633240) from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia. Disclosure JO is an employee of AstraZeneca. Other authors declare no conflict of interest. Funding agencies ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1930-7381 1930-739X |
DOI: | 10.1002/oby.21122 |