Anatomies of Relatedness: Considering Personhood in Aboriginal Australia

Anthropologists have described Aboriginal Australian personhood in various ways, in 1986, Myers spoke about the tension between autonomy and relatedness that he identified as intrinsic aspects of Pintupi identity. More recently, Keen (2006) has identified the extension of Yolngu persons in time and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:American anthropologist Vol. 114; no. 2; pp. 297 - 308
Main Author: Glaskin, Katie
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Malden, USA Wiley Periodicals, Inc 01-06-2012
Blackwell Publishing Inc
American Anthropological Association
Wiley
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Anthropologists have described Aboriginal Australian personhood in various ways, in 1986, Myers spoke about the tension between autonomy and relatedness that he identified as intrinsic aspects of Pintupi identity. More recently, Keen (2006) has identified the extension of Yolngu persons in time and space; others have described Aboriginal personhood as "dividual." Based on ethnography from the northwest Kimberley region of Western Australia, I argue that one way of characterizing personhood is as an ontology of embodied relatedness. In this, I draw inspiration from Ashforth's (2011) approach to relational realism, in which he extends the field of relations under consideration to entities beyond the human. I also consider Viveiros de Castro's (2009) synthesis of kinship, exchange, and magic to argue that the relationship between these can be understood through the embodied relationality that is at the core of cultural conceptions of the person.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:0002-7294
1548-1433
DOI:10.1111/j.1548-1433.2012.01426.x