"It's Never Too Early": Preconception Care and Postgenomic Models of Life

In this article, we are concerned with the expanded public health interest in the "preconception period" as a window of opportunity for intervention to improve long-term population health outcomes. While definitions of the "preconception period" remain vague, new classifications...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Frontiers in sociology Vol. 5; p. 21
Main Authors: Pentecost, Michelle, Meloni, Maurizio
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 21-04-2020
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In this article, we are concerned with the expanded public health interest in the "preconception period" as a window of opportunity for intervention to improve long-term population health outcomes. While definitions of the "preconception period" remain vague, new classifications and categories of life are becoming formalized as biomedicine begins to conduct research on, and suggest intervention in, this undefined and potentially unlimited time before conception. In particular, we focus on the burgeoning epidemiological interest in epigenetics and Developmental Origins of Health and Disease (DOHaD) research as simultaneously a theoretical spyglass into postgenomic biology and a catalyst toward a public health focus on preconception care. We historicize the notion that there are long-term implications of parental behaviors before conception, illustrating how, as Han and Das have noted, "newness comes to be embedded in older forms even as it transforms them" (Han and Das, 2015, p. 2). We then consider how DOHaD frameworks justify a number of fragmented claims about preconception by making novel evidentiary assertions. Engaging with the philosophy of Georges Canguilhem, we examine the relationship between reproductive risk and revised understandings of biological permeability, and discuss some of the epistemic and political implications of emerging claims in postgenomics.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Reviewed by: Richard Tutton, University of York, United Kingdom; Luca Chiapperino, Université de Lausanne, Switzerland
This article was submitted to Medical Sociology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Sociology
Edited by: Sangeeta Chattoo, University of York, United Kingdom
ISSN:2297-7775
2297-7775
DOI:10.3389/fsoc.2020.00021